The Dunstan Rohe is part of the Clutha/Mata-au Freshwater Management Unit (FMU).
We are developing a Land and Water Regional Plan (LWRP) in partnership with Kāi Tahu whānui, and with feedback from the greater Otago community.
Join the kōrero on the proposed direction of the Plan to care for Otago’s lakes, rivers and streams and guide the activities that impact them.
We encourage you to look over our summary of proposed new rules and regulations.
The Arrow and Cardrona River catchments are part of the Dunstan Rohe. Local communities began identifying values and objectives and setting minimum flows and take limits for surface water and groundwater in these catchments before the Plan process began. This work will be incorporated in the Plan.
Click here to see a summary of community values collected for the Arrow River and its aquifers and the Cardrona River and its aquifers.
Better understand what Otago Freshwater Management Units (FMUs) are.
The Arrow River catchment and the Wakatipu Basin aquifers form part of the Dunstan Rohe.
The Cardrona catchment forms part of the Dunstan Rohe.
Under national legislation, regional councils must manage waterways at an appropriate scale for setting freshwater objectives and limits. We set five Freshwater Management Units (FMUs) for the region, and divided the Clutah/Mata-Au River into five rohe (areas) as it is the largest river in the country, by catchment and volume.
The Dunstan Rohe runs from the outlets of lakes Wānaka, Whakatipu and Hāwea down to Clyde Dam. It includes the Kawarau, Nevis, Shotover, Upper Clutha/Mata-au, Hāwea, Cardrona, Arrow and Lindis rivers. Many smaller tributaries of the Clutha/Mata-au are also included such as the Lowburn, Amisfield Burn, Bannock Burn and Luggate Creek.
Outflows of lakes Wānaka and Whakatipu are unregulated whereas the outflow of Lake Hāwea is controlled by the Hāwea Dam. This rohe also includes Lake Dunstan, a run of river hydro-electricity reservoir created by the Clyde Dam.
Diverse landforms include the rugged Kawarau gorge, tracts of native bush in the remote Shotover catchment and extensive agriculture and fruit-growing areas.
Māori were drawn inland to this area by the mahika kai network, important for transporting people and resources such as pounamu to the coast. The area later supported gold mining and agricultural endeavours, creating a rich cultural heritage of structures and sites.
South of Lake Dunstan, Cromwell is the largest urban centre. The economic focus of the area is tourism and agriculture, the latter ranging from viticulture and orchards to sheep and beef farming.
Freshwater policies for the Dunstan Rohe may affect areas beyond this. We have combined the Dunstan Rohe and the neighbouring Upper Lakes Rohe when considering socio-economic information. These communities have close economic ties – for example, residents often live in one area and work or spend time in the other.
In 2018, the Upper Lakes Rohe and Dunstan Rohe were home to around 47,400 residents (21% of Otago’s population). In the previous 12 years, the population in these rohe increased by 19,300 people (or 69%) from 28,000 residents in 2006. This rapid population growth increases pressure on water use (water takes and discharges of pollutants or contaminants) and its infrastructure. Overall, these rohe have relatively low social deprivation, measured in terms of income, home ownership, employment, access to transport and communications, and access to internet.
The local communities and the economy in the Upper Lakes and Dunstan rohe rely heavily on water resources. The most populated towns are built around the lakes. Tourism, the most important industry sector in the rohe, relies on freshwater (including snow, which is essential for the ski resorts). Agricultural activities, mainly dry stock (including deer and with little/no dairy in the Upper Lakes Rohe) and horticulture/viticulture operations, depend on freshwater supplies.
An understanding of Māori history and the Māori economy is essential when developing policy and assessing its impact. Pre-European Māori history shapes today’s Aotearoa, and the Māori economy is integral to the national economic system. ORC is partnering with Aukaha and Te Ao Marama to develop an overview of Kāi Tahu history and economy
Exotic grasslands, primarily for farming, cover 37% of the rohe, and 23% is conservation land. Sheep and beef are the dominant farming type (45%), followed by mixed livestock farming including sheep, beef and deer (15%), and sheep (5%). Dairy, nurseries, vineyards and orchards take up 1% of the land area.
Over the past 30 years, the conservation estate has increased by 293%, urban development by 108% and nurseries/vineyards/orchards by 33%. Dry-stock farming has decreased by 25%, although it is still the most common land use in the Dunstan area.
Most frequent soil types are Brown (53%), Pallic (29%) and Semi-arid (11%). Most Brown and Semi-arid soils are moderately or well-drained and permeable. However, in some areas, Brown soils have poor drainage, including parts of the Lindis, Nevis and Luggate catchments. Semi-arid soils extend from the Lindis river catchment down to Bannock Burn. Raw soils occur in 4% of the rohe in alpine rock areas where erosion is active – for example, Centaur peaks and Mount Aurum.
The cClimate in the Dunstan Rohe is very diverse, with and includes some of the wettest, driest, warmest, and coldest places in New Zealand. Annual rainfall in the headwaters of the Shotover River is more than 3000mm per year, while in parts of the Upper Clutha Mata-au Valley, rainfall is less than 400mm per year. There is a steep rainfall gradient from west to east, with the Shotover headwaters being only about 50 km from the low-rainfall Upper Clutha Mata-au area.
Air temperatures ranging from -10oC to 36oC have been recorded in the Upper Clutha Mata-au Valley. Temperatures of less than -10oC are likely in the headwaters of the Shotover River, where it is close to permanent snow and ice.
There is abundant water in rivers where rainfall or snow melt is plentiful, including theThe Shotover, Kawarau and Clutha Mata-au rRivers have abundant water thanks to plentiful rainfall or snow melt in their headwaters headwaters. However, much less water in smaller rivers and streams in the Upper Clutha Mata-au Valley have much less water, with having only about 10% of the rainfall in the Shotover headwaters.
Very little water is taken from the Shotover and Nevis rRivers, but there is significant water use in the Upper Clutha Mata-au Valley from the Clutha Mata-au river, and the Hāwea and Dunstan lakes. Here, irrigation is the lifeblood of farming, and some streams run dry in summer.
Water quality is generally very good. However, there is pressure on water quality in drier catchments that have high water use or high population growth rates. ORC monitors the water quality and ecology of rivers and streams. The combined results can show the health of a river or stream, and long-term data is analysed to show trends in water quality. Many sites in this rohe have been monitored for less than five years, so we only have interim results for the state of water quality and trends.
Six of the 16 river sites monitored did not meet the required standard for at least one measurement, according to the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (2020). Upper Cardona, Quartz Reef Creek, Mill Creek, Lindis at Lindis Peak and Clutha Mata-au at Luggate did not meet the national bottom line for suspended fine sediment (visual clarity). The bacteria E. coli is measured to indicate safety for human contact. E. coli results did not meet the national bottom line at Upper Cardrona and Kawarau at Chards. Aquatic insect life did not meet the national bottom line at Mill Creek. Two of the three monitored lakes, Lake Hayes and Lake Johnson, did not meet the national bottom line for chlorophyll-a, a measure of algae levels in the water. This result is consistent with the nutrient-enriched state of these lakes.
Despite most sites’ very good water quality, some degrading trends were identified. In particular, the Cardrona River had 10-year degrading trends for E. coli, nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) and an aquatic insect life metric. Luggate Creek had 10-year degrading trends for E. coli, nitrogen and turbidity (poor visibility). Mill Creek had improving trends for nutrients and E. coli, but a degrading trend for turbidity.
Dunstan area Water Quality State and Trends Technical Report
Groundwater has been greatly affected by glacial advances and retreats, which created several large basins that hold relatively deep gravel aquifers and shallow alluvial ribbon aquifers near rivers – the Hāwea basin, Wānaka & Cardrona basin, Whakatipu basin, Cromwell Terrace aquifer, Lower Tarras/Bendigo aquifer, and the Lowburn alluvial aquifer.
Groundwater use is high, with around 1,000 completed bores registered with the ORC. Primary groundwater uses are for domestic and stock water, irrigation, community supply and monitoring. The Dunstan Rohe has around 240 resource consents to draw groundwater, with a total annual consented volume of about 89.874 million m3.
ORC monitors groundwater quality in 16 State of the Environment (SoE) bores across the Dunstan Rohe. The results suggest good groundwater quality with low E. coli and nitrate concentrations below the Drinking Water Standards limits in most bores. However, several bores – including some in Wānaka, the Wakatipu basin and Lower Tarras – have had elevated E. coli, nitrate and Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus (DRP) concentrations.
These are likely to reflect the rapid development of the area. Arsenic concentrations in most monitoring bores are generally below the limit, although elevated concentrations were measured in some bores. These are likely to be caused by the local schist geology. As schist is common across the rohe, groundwater users should regularly test their bore water.
The Dunstan Rohe includes rare and threatened ecosystems and species. Rare and vulnerable ecosystems associated with freshwater include ephemeral wetlands, inland saline ecosystems, lake margins and wetlands.
These ecosystems contribute a lot to national biodiversity, but are often threatened by changes in land use and invasive species. Often, little is known about their extent and/or condition.
Many species depend on freshwater and ecosystems including fishes, invertebrates, plants, and birds. Many native freshwater species are under threat and their numbers continue to decline.
We have identified 65 threatened freshwater-dependent species. The rohe provides habitat for native fishes including three non-migratory galaxias, four migratory galaxias (whitebait), two eel and five bullies. Some of these fish are threatened, for example, the lamprey and all non-migratory galaxias.
Freshwater invertebrates are koura, mussels and threatened stoneflies. Threatened freshwater-dependent plants are Chenopodium detestans and Triglochin palustris. Many birds also depend on these ecosystems, temporarily or permanently, including the threatened Australasian crested grebe and black-fronted tern.
Exotic fishes in the Dunstan Rohe are goldfish, perch and four salmonids.
Ten sites are recognised as Regionally Significant Wetlands. These are swamp (4 sites), fen (3), marsh (2), and bog (1).
On the delta where the Upper Clutha Mata-au runs into Lake Dunstan, the Bendigo Wetland (244 hectares) has developed swampy, willow-edged river margins. This wetland provides a habitat for diverse wildlife and is especially valuable for birds and angling.
Further upstream, above Luggate, the Campbells Reserve Pond Margins (one hectare) is a small marsh, spring-fed from seepage off the terraces above. Butterfield Wetland (two hectares), on an old Hawea River terrace, is of similar origin, with a raupō-edged pond.
Two sites in the Nevis Valley, Nevis Red Tussock Fen (44 hectares) and Schoolhouse Flat Red Tussock Fen (nine hectares), have communities of red tussock and various carex species distributed according to the soil wetness.
At the head of the Nevis, in its Roaring Lion catchment, is New Zealand’s largest string bog system, which also extends into the Nokomai catchment, Southland. This system combines terraced tarns, fens, bogs and snowbanks. In the Queenstown area, Lake Hayes Margins (17 hectares) has lake fringes of raupō, crack- and grey-willows, and some carex swamp.
Moke Creek Swamp (one hectare) and Moke Lake Bog (12 hectares) have both bog and swamp types. In one of the heads of the Shotover, the Polnoon, the Church Hill Wetland Complex (103 hectares) occupies a fault-derived basin with glacial moraines, bogs, fens, tarns and ephemeral wetlands.
Two additional sites are Queenstown Hill (a Conservation Covenant-protected site of cushion bog and tarn communities) and the head of Pisa Range Roaring Meg, with sedge and cushion bogs and tarns.
We are developing a Land and Water Regional Plan (LWRP) in partnership with Kāi Tahu whānui, and with feedback from the greater Otago community.
Join the kōrero on the proposed direction of the Plan to care for Otago's lakes, rivers and streams and guide the activities that impact them.
We have a summary of proposed new rules and regulations that we encourage you to look over.
This summary provides an overview of the provisions relating to the Dunstan Rohe (area). This includes environmental outcomes, target attribute states and area-specific rules and limits. The rules and limits are in addition to those in the region-wide rules covered in the other summaries.
If you are unsure of any particular terms, there is a glossary of terms.
Overview of content updates:
In its new Land and Water Regional Plan ORC must set environmental outcomes for the freshwater values identified in the Dunstan Rohe. An environmental outcome statement describes the desired future state that communities in the Dunstan Rohe and tangata whenua would like to see for a specific value.
The environmental outcome statements are very similar across all FMUs and rohe in Otago, which reflects the fact that the aspirations that tangata whenua and the different communities have for the environment are largely consistent across the region. Table 1 sets out the draft environmental outcomes for the Dunstan Rohe.
Value |
Environmental Outcomes for Dunstan Rohe |
Attributes |
NPS-FM compulsory values (apply to every FMU/rohe) |
||
Ecosystem health |
Freshwater bodies support healthy freshwater ecosystems with thriving habitats for a range of indigenous species, and the life stages of those species, that would be expected to occur naturally. |
Rivers: Ammonia Nitrate Suspended fine sediment E.Coli Dissolved reactive phosphorus Periphyton Macroinvertebrates (MCI/ASPM) Fish IBI E. Coli primary contact sites Macroinvertebrates (QMCI) score*1 Deposited fine sediment* Dissolved oxygen* Ecosystem metabolism* Lakes: Phytoplankton (Chlorophyll-a) Total nitrogen Total phosphorus Ammonia Cyanobacteria* Submerged plants (natives)* Submerged plants, (invasive)* Lake-bottom dissolved oxygen* Mid-hypolimnetic dissolved oxygen* |
Human contact |
Water bodies are clean and safe for human contact activities and support the health of people and their connections with water bodies. |
Rivers: E. Coli Suspended fine sediment Periphyton E. Coli primary contact sites Lakes: Phytoplankton (Chlorophyll-a) Cyanobacteria (Biovolume cubic millimetres per litre)* |
Threatened species |
The freshwater habitats of threatened species are protected and support the persistence and recovery of threatened species over time. |
All the attributes listed for Ecosystem Health above.
Recency of presence National conservation category and status Regional conservation category and status Number of sub-populations |
Mahika kai (food and resource gathering) |
Mahika kai resources are restored to a condition in which populations of valued mahika kai species are self-sustaining and plentiful enough to support cultural take. Mana whenua are able to safely access, harvest and use these resources now and in the future. |
All the attributes listed for Ecosystem Health above.
|
Other values (apply to every FMU/rohe) |
||
Natural form and character |
Freshwater bodies and their riparian margins, and any connected receiving environment including any estuaries and hāpua (lagoon) are able to behave in a way that reflects their natural form and character to the greatest extent practicable, and the natural form and function of unmodified water bodies is protected. |
Rivers: Suspended fine sediment Periphyton Macroinvertebrates (QMCI) score* Deposited fine sediment* Lakes: Phytoplankton (Chlorophyll-a) Cyanobacteria* Submerged plants (natives)* Submerged plants, (invasive)* Lake-bottom dissolved oxygen* Mid-hypolimnetic dissolved oxygen* |
Drinking water supply |
Provided the health and wellbeing needs of water bodies and freshwater ecosystems are met, source water from waterbodies (after treatment) is safe and reliable for the drinking water supply needs of the community. Activities do not introduce or increase the concentration of contaminants in water, so that, after existing treatment, it no longer meets drinking water standards |
|
Wāhi tūpuna |
Cultural associations with wāhi tūpuna are maintained, visible, and whānau are able to access, use and relate to wāhi tūpuna now and in the future. |
Coming soon.
|
Fishing |
Fish are safe to eat; and Insofar as it is consistent with the protection of indigenous and threatened species, the spawning and juvenile rearing waters for trout and salmon are provided for. |
Rivers: E. Coli Suspended fine sediment Periphyton Nitrate Suspended fine sediment Macroinvertebrates (MCI/ASPM) Fish IBI Macroinvertebrates (QMCI) score* Lakes: Phytoplankton (Chlorophyll-a) Cyanobacteria (Biovolume cubic millimetres per litre)* |
Irrigation, cultivation and production of food and beverages |
Provided the health and wellbeing of water bodies and freshwater ecosystems and human health needs are met, the cultivation and production of food, beverages and fibre is enabled. |
Rivers: Suspended fine sediment Periphyton Water quantity |
Wetlands |
Wetlands are protected, and their ecosystem health, indigenous biodiversity, and hydrological functioning is restored where degraded. |
Coming soon.
|
Taoka species (treasured species) |
Thriving, connected habitats for indigenous species are restored and sustained for ever and their mauri is intact. |
Coming soon.
|
Values that apply to specific FMU |
|
|
Hydro-electric power generation |
Existing hydro-electric generation activities are developed, operated, maintained and upgraded in a way that meets the environmental outcomes to the greatest extent practicable. |
|
¹*Asterisk indicates that the baseline state of these compulsory attributes is not known, but monitoring is now being undertaken.
Attributes are indicators that we can measure and monitor. Attributes tell us about the state of a river or lake. A target attribute state (TAS) is the state that an attribute must achieve to make sure that an environmental outcome is met. The timeframe for achieving the TAS for each FMU is set by the environmental outcomes for the FMU. For the Dunstan rohe, the environmental outcomes are to be achieved by 2045. By monitoring attributes and comparing their baseline state with their TAS we learn how well how well we are on track towards achieving the environmental outcomes for this FMU or rohe.
While the environmental outcome statements are largely consistent across Otago, baseline states and TAS are usually specific to each FMU and rohe. Attributes for each value and baseline states for those attributes have been identified along with trends derived from the Otago Regional Council's State of the Environment (SoE) monitoring data.
The baseline state and TAS for the Dunstan rohe are in the map below.
Zoom into an area and view the various locations of proposed monitoring sites in an area(s).
Select the yellow dot representing a proposed monitoring site to see the Target Attribute States.
You can further select the Target Attribute States table to view a larger version of the table.
(Note: If you are on a mobile device, tap on the arrow next to the 'X' icon for the table to show.)
National direction requires Council to set limits as rules or action plans (as appropriate) to achieve the environmental outcomes. This can be done at a region-wide level or at FMU/rohe level. The draft region-wide rules are set out in different briefing papers, including the briefing papers Primary Production, Wastewater, Stormwater, Earthworks, Water Quantity and various others. However, for the Dunstan Rohe a number of specific rules are proposed that are needed to make sure the environmental outcomes for this rohe are achieved overtime. These additional rules, which will be included in the Dunstan Rohe chapter of the new Land and Water Regional Plan, are shown in the table below.
Contaminants of concern |
Draft LWRP |
Rivers
Lakes
Groundwater
|
|
The Dunstan Rohe chapter will also include take limits and environmental flows and levels for rivers, lakes and aquifers in this rohe.
Take limits reflect the total quantity of water that can be taken, dammed or diverted from a stream, river, lake or aquifer. Once the combined rate of take for all consented water takes, diversion or damming activities from a water body matches this take limit no further water can be allocated in new consents.
Environmental flows (for rivers or streams) or environmental levels (for lakes and aquifers) include minimum flows or levels at which any all consented (and some permitted) takes, diversions and damming activities must cease. These restrictions on water taking, diversions or damming activities typically occur during dry periods and are needed to make sure after important values, such as threatened fish, drinking water supply or mahika kai (food and resource gathering) values, are looked after.
Environmental levels and take limits for the lakes in the Dunstan Rohe are shown in the table below.
Given their high values, it is proposed that a narrative take limit is set for all natural lakes in the Dunstan Rohe. This limit will prohibit any new takes, damming or diversions that could impact water levels in these lakes (except for takes that are permitted under the Resource Management Act 1991) and will ensure that these lakes will continue to behave in their natural or near natural state.
Alternative regimes are proposed for the rohe’s controlled lakes. Lake Dunstan will continue to be managed in accordance with its consented lake level conditions, while any takes from this lake will be subject to the take limits that apply to the Clutha River/Mata-Au. Downeys Dam will be subject to the minimum environmental flow and take limit set for Mill Creek.
Name |
Environmental level(s) |
Take limit |
Natural lakes (unmodified) |
||
Dukes Tarn Lake Kirkpatrick Lake Luna Lake Te Kōhua Little Lake McKay Lochnager/Ōtaka Sheehey Lake Moke Lake/Punamāhaka/Waikā māhaka |
Natural minimum water level |
Narrative - no new taking, diversions, damming or discharges from the lake or upper catchment |
Natural lakes (with current consents) |
||
Lake Alta (Rastus Burn river catchment) Lake Hayes (Mill Creek catchment) Lake Johnson (Shotover River catchment) Lake McKay (Luggate Creek catchment) |
Lake level managed by the minimum flow of the river catchment that the lake is located within
|
Narrative - no new taking, diversions, damming or discharges from the lake or upper catchment.
Existing takes subject to the take limit of the river catchment that the lake is located within
|
Controlled lakes |
||
Lake Dunstan |
Consented levels |
Subject to the Clutha River/Mata-Au catchment take limit |
Downeys Dam (Mill Creek catchment) |
Lake level managed by the minimum flow of the river catchment that the lake is located within |
Subject to the take limit of the river catchment that the lake is located within |
Environmental flows and take limits for the Dunstan Rohe’s rivers and streams are shown in the table below. Take limits and environmental flows are often set as a percentage of the 7-day Mean Annual Low Flow (7-day MALF). The 7-day MALF is a flow statistic that provides an indication of how low the flow gets in a typical year.
For smaller rivers or streams with a mean flow of 5,000 litres per second or less, such as the Cairnmuir Creek or Dairy Creek, a total take limit will be set as 20% of the 7-day MALF. For larger rivers with a mean flow of more than 5,000 l/s, such as the Nevis and Shotover, a take limit of 30% of the 7-day MALF is proposed.
Restrictions on water takes, diversions and damming activities in catchments of smaller rivers will be triggered when flows are at 90% of the 7-day MALF, whereas for larger rivers these restrictions will not kick in until flows are at 80% of the 7-day MALF.
Bespoke limits and environmental flows will be set in the Land and Water Regional Plan for various other rivers including the Arrow river, Cardrona river and Luggate Creek. For some bespoke catchments where a transition may be needed to achieve the environmental outcomes of the catchment and phase out over-allocation it is proposed to set a common consent duration expiry date for any new consent granted under the LWRP framework, the proposed common catchment date for rivers where this will apply in the Dunstan Rohe is 2033.
Finally, for a third category of streams and rivers, such as the Rastus Burn and Bendigo Creek, Otago Regional Council proposes to set interim take limits and environmental flows according to the default method above. These will be implemented through the resource consent replacement process. However, prior to this resource consent replacement process Council will assess whether there is a need to set bespoke minimum flows and take limits for these rivers through a plan change process. Given the current level of water use and allocation, these rivers will in effect be either fully allocated or over-allocated and any new taking of water will not be available.
Table 4 provides estimates of the actual minimum flows and take limits for different catchments based on the default method using the best available information to determine the 7-day MALF of each catchment. The numeric minimum flows and take limits will not be included in the LWRP. Instead, the LWRP will refer to the relevant % of 7-day MALF.
Table 4: Rivers managed by interim default minimum flows and take limits
Name |
Environmental flow (l/s)
|
Take limit (l/s)
|
Further allocation available (estimate based on best available information) |
|||
River catchments with a mean flow ≤ 5,000 l/s and managed by default limits · Minimum flow set as 90% of 7-day MALF · Take limit set as 20% of 7-day MALF |
||||||
Burn Cottage Creek |
157 |
35 |
Yes |
|||
Burton Creek |
140 |
31 |
Yes |
|||
Byford Creek |
285 |
63 |
Yes |
|||
Cairnmuir Creek |
180 |
40 |
Yes |
|||
Campbells Creek |
168 |
37 |
Yes |
|||
Cascade Stream |
119 |
26 |
Yes |
|||
Champagne Gully Creek |
121 |
27 |
Yes |
|||
Crook Burn (2) |
154 |
34 |
Yes |
|||
Dairy Creek |
241 |
54 |
Yes |
|||
Dead Horse Creek |
186 |
41 |
Yes |
|||
Devils Creek |
206 |
46 |
Yes |
|||
Franks Creek |
258 |
57 |
Yes |
|||
Gentle Annie Creek |
173 |
38 |
Yes |
|||
Gibbston Back Road Creek |
276 |
61 |
Yes |
|||
Goat Camp Creek |
299 |
66 |
Yes |
|||
Italian Creek |
221 |
49 |
Yes |
|||
Jackson Creek |
216 |
48 |
Yes |
|||
Kidd Creek |
75 |
17 |
Yes |
|||
Kingston Road Creek |
313 |
70 |
Yes |
|||
Leaning Rock Creek |
253 |
56 |
Yes |
|||
Long Gully Creek (1) |
373 |
83 |
Yes |
|||
Long Gully Creek (2) |
74 |
16 |
Yes |
|||
Maori Point Creek |
85 |
19 |
Yes |
|||
McKenzie Creek |
184 |
41 |
Yes |
|||
Mt Pisa Creek |
284 |
63 |
Yes |
|||
Muddy Creek |
331 |
74 |
Yes |
|||
Nine Mile Creek |
175 |
39 |
Yes |
|||
Owens Creek |
301 |
67 |
Yes |
|||
Paterson Road Creek |
329 |
73 |
No |
|||
Pigeon Creek |
118 |
26 |
Yes |
|||
Queensberry Hills Creek |
202 |
45 |
Yes |
|||
Raupo Creek |
128 |
29 |
Yes |
|||
Ripponvale Road Creek |
83 |
18 |
Yes |
|||
School Creek |
267 |
59 |
Yes |
|||
Sheepskin Creek (1) |
184 |
41 |
Yes |
|||
Sonora Creek |
269 |
60 |
Yes |
|||
Trig Burn |
137 |
30 |
Yes |
|||
Walkers Creek |
147 |
33 |
Yes |
|||
Weatherall Creek |
218 |
48 |
Yes |
|||
River catchments with a mean flow > 5,000 l/s and managed by default limits · Minimum flow set as 80% of 7-day MALF · Take limit set as 30% of 7-day MALF |
||||||
Shotover River |
8594 |
3223 |
Yes |
|||
Nevis River |
2863 |
1074 |
Yes |
Table 5 provides estimates of the actual minimum flows and take limits for different catchments based on the default method using the best available information to determine the 7-day MALF of each catchment. The numeric minimum flows and take limits will not be included in the LWRP. Instead, the LWRP will refer to the relevant % of 7-day MALF.
Name |
Environmental flow (l/s)
|
Take limit (l/s)
|
Further allocation available (estimate based on best available information) |
||
River catchments managed by bespoke limits |
|||||
Arrow River |
1,000 |
700 |
No |
||
Cardrona River – Upper Reach to Mt Barker |
750 Nov – April 2,100 May - Oct |
600 (max instantaneous rate of take restriction of 350 l /s) |
No |
||
Cardrona River – Mt Barker to SH6 |
0 |
0 |
No |
||
Cardrona River – SH6 to confluence |
340 |
30-35 |
No |
||
Lindis River |
550 Oct – May 1,600 Jun - Sept |
1,612 |
No |
||
Low Burn |
80 Oct – March 100 April - Sept |
140 |
No |
||
Luggate Creek |
450 |
320 |
No |
||
Mill Creek |
180 |
80 |
No |
Name |
Environmental flow (l/s)
|
Take limit (l/s) |
Further allocation available (estimate based on best available information) |
|
River catchments – default limits set as interim and to be given effect to at the time of consent renewal unless bespoke limits set |
||||
Albert Burn (1) |
158 |
35 |
No |
|
Amisfield Burn |
149 |
33 |
No |
|
Bannock Burn |
222 |
49 |
No |
|
Bendigo Creek |
276 |
61 |
No |
|
Camp Creek (1) |
324 |
72 |
No |
|
Five Mile Creek (1) |
277 |
62 |
No |
|
John Bull Creek |
207 |
46 |
No |
|
Locharburn |
132 |
29 |
No |
|
Park Burn |
367 |
81 |
No |
|
Pipeclay Gully Creek |
174 |
39 |
No |
|
Poison Creek |
252 |
56 |
No |
|
Quartz Reef Creek |
313 |
70 |
No |
|
Rastus Burn |
313 |
70 |
No |
|
Roaring Meg |
1069 |
238 |
No |
|
Schoolhouse Creek |
98 |
22 |
No |
|
Scrubby Stream |
129 |
29 |
No |
|
Toms Creek |
367 |
82 |
No |
The Dunstan Rohe contains a large number of aquifers.
For some aquifers that are not hydraulically connected to surface water, such as the Mid Mill Creek Aquifer and Frankton Flats Aquifer, take limits will be set based on a proportion of the mean annual recharge of that aquifer (35%), while for others, such as the aquifers in the Hawea Basin and the Wanaka-Basin Cardrona Gravel Aquifer bespoke take limits will be set in the Land and Water Regional Plan.
National direction also requires Otago Regional Council also to set environmental levels for this type of aquifers, we do currently not have sufficient groundwater level monitoring data to set environmental levels in the plan when it will be notified. Therefore, environmental levels for these aquifers will be set at a later date.
For aquifers with a close hydraulic connection to a river or stream, such as the Cardrona or Lindis Alluvial Ribbon Aquifers, any taking of water will be subject to the take limits and environmental flows set for these rivers.
Table 7 provides an estimate of the actual takes limit for the aquifer based on the default method using the best available information to determine the aquifer’s Mean Annual Recharge (MAR). The numeric take limit will not be included in the LWRP. Instead, the LWRP will refer to the relevant % of the MAR.
Name |
Environmental level(s) |
Take limit (volume in m3/year) |
Further allocation available (estimate based on best available information) |
|
Aquifers managed by default limits
|
||||
Whakatipu Basin - Frankton Flats Aquifer
|
Not required to be included in the new LWRP at this time |
147,000 |
Yes |
|
Whakatipu Basin - Ladies Mile Aquifer
|
168,000
|
Yes |
||
Whakatipu Basin - Morven Aquifer
|
94,500
|
Yes |
||
Whakatipu Basin - Upper Mill Creek Aquifer |
420,000
|
Yes
|
||
Whakatipu Basin - Mid Mill Creek Aquifer
|
357,000
|
Yes
|
||
Whakatipu Basin - Speargrass-Hawthorn Aquifer
|
161,000 |
Yes |
||
Pisa Groundwater Management Zone
|
4,550,000
|
Yes
|
||
Queensbury Groundwater Management Zone
|
1,540,000
|
No
|
||
Luggate Groundwater Management Zone
|
4,060,000 |
Yes |
Table 8 sets out the aquifer that will be managed by bespoke take limits. These include some new ground water allocation zones in the Hawea aquifer basin and some proposed wetland exclusion zones to protect the Butterfield and Campbell’s wetlands.
Name |
Environmental level(s) |
Take limit (volume in m3/year) |
Further allocation available (estimate based on best available information) |
Aquifers managed by bespoke limits |
|
||
Ardgour Valley Aquifer |
Not required to be included in the new LWRP at this time |
132,732 |
Yes |
Bendigo Aquifer |
29,000,000 |
Yes |
|
Cromwell Terrace Aquifer |
4,000,000 |
Yes |
|
Lower Tarras Aquifer |
18,800,000 |
Yes |
|
Wanaka-Basin Cardrona Gravel Aquifer – Western Zone |
1,300,000 + allowance for SW takes from Cardrona losing reach going to groundwater |
Yes |
|
Wanaka-Basin Cardrona Gravel Aquifer – Eastern Zone |
35% MAR |
|
|
Hawea Basin - Hawea Flat Zone |
8,680,000 |
Yes |
|
Hawea Basin - Grandview Zone |
787,000 |
Yes |
|
Hawea Basin - Terrace Aquifer - Hill |
410,000 |
Yes |
|
Hawea Basin -Terrace Aquifer -River |
1,560,000
|
Yes |
|
Hawea Basin - Sandy Point |
462,399 |
No |
|
Hawea Basin - Te Awa |
297,000 |
No |
|
Hawea Basin - Maungawera Flat |
570,000 |
No |
|
Hawea Basin - Maungawera Valley |
726,000 |
No |
|
Hawea Basin - Butterfield Exclusion Zone (wetland protection zone) |
- |
No |
|
Hawea Basin - Campbell’s Exclusion Zone (wetland exclusion zone) |
- |
No |
For aquifers with a close hydraulic connection to a river or stream, such as the Cardrona or Lindis Alluvial Ribbon Aquifers, any taking of water will be subject to the take limits and environmental flows set for these rivers.
Name |
Environmental level(s) |
Take limit |
Further allocation available (estimate based on best available information) |
Alluvial ribbon aquifers |
|
||
Whakatipu Basin - Arrow-Bush Ribbon Aquifer |
Groundwater level managed by minimum flow for Arrow River |
Subject to take limit river for Arrow River catchment |
No |
Cardrona Alluvial Ribbon Aquifer |
Groundwater level managed by minimum flow for Cardrona River catchment |
Subject to take limit river for Cardrona River catchment |
No |
Lindis Alluvial Ribbon Aquifer |
Groundwater level managed by minimum flow for Lindis River catchment |
Subject to take limit river for Lindis River catchment |
No |
Lowburn Alluvial Ribbon Aquifer |
Groundwater level managed by minimum flow for Lowburn River catchment |
Subject to take limit river for Lowburn River catchment |
No |
Shotover Alluvial Ribbon Aquifer |
Groundwater level managed by minimum flow for Shotover River catchment |
Subject to take limit river for Shotover River catchment |
No |
Outstanding water bodies are water bodies that have one or more outstanding values. National direction requires the Otago Reginal Council to identify outstanding water bodies and protect their important values. The table below lists the outstanding water bodies in this rohe and describes their outstanding values.
Below is a map featuring all the water bodies in Otago.
You can zoom in and view the various water bodies in an area(s).
Water bodies are shown in a blue colour. Select an area to view the water body name.
(Note: if you are on a mobile device, after selecting a water body, tap on the arrow next to the 'X' icon to view more information.)
Unique identifier |
Site identifier |
Values and characteristics |
Ecology |
||
ECL11 |
Punamāhaka / Waikāmāhaka / Moke Lake |
|
ECL12 |
Waiwhakaata / Lake Hayes |
|
ECL13 |
Te Papapuni/Nevis River |
|
Physical |
||
PHY11 |
Kawarau gorge |
|
PHY12 |
Ōtaka / Lochnagar debris dam and lake |
|
PHY13 |
Lake Alta cirque |
|
PHY14 |
Pisa Range cirques |
|
Recreation |
||
REC42 |
Clutha River / Mata-au (Wānaka to Hāwea River) |
|
REC43 |
Clutha River / Mata-au (Hāwea River to Te Wairere/Lake Dunstan) |
|
REC44 |
Kawarau River |
|
REC45 |
Te Papapuni / Nevis River |
|
REC46 |
Kimiākau / Shotover River |
|
Natural character |
||
NAT8 |
Shotover |
Active Bed
Margins
Context
|
NAT9 |
Nevis |
Active bed
Margins
Context
|
NAT10 |
Pisa |
Active Bed
Margin
Context
|
NAT11 |
Dunstan Mountains |
Active bed
Margin
Context
|
Natural features and landscapes |
||
LAN25 |
Ōtaka / Lochnagar |
|
LAN26 |
Kimiākau / Shotover River and tributaries |
|
LAN27 |
Punamāhaka / Waikāmāhaka / Moke Lake |
|
LAN28 |
Arrow River |
|
LAN29 |
Waiwhakaata / Lake Hayes |
|
LAN30 |
Kawarau River |
|
LAN31 |
Lake Alta |
|
LAN32 |
Cardrona River |
|
LAN33 |
Te Papapuni / Nevis River |
|
LAN34 |
Roaring Meg |
|
LAN35 |
Lindis River |
|
LAN36 |
Clutha River / Mata-au (Upper) |
|
LAN37 |
Clutha River / Mata-au (Te Wairere / Lake Dunstan) |
|
January 2020
PDF | 1 MB
December 2017
PDF | 1 MB
June 2020
PDF | 3 MB
May 2022
PDF | 5 MB
March 2023
PDF | 6 MB
December 2022
PDF | 501 KB
October 2023
PDF | 935 KB
March 2017
PDF | 1 MB
March 2024
PDF | 3 MB
November 2023
PDF | 583 KB
June 2023
PDF | 599 KB
December 2023
PDF | 26 MB
February 2017
PDF | 187 KB
January 2016
PDF | 2 MB
October 2014
PDF | 9 MB
Contact your rohe Catchment Advisor for advice and assistance on sustainable land management practices that protect Otago’s waterways.
Sign up to our monthly newsletter On Stream for regular updates
Email customerservices@orc.govt.nz
Tel 0800 474 082