The draft Plan for Otago is made up of proposed rules, regulations and policies for different activities, also known as 'chapters'. Please note the material on this web page about the new Land and Water Regional Plan (LWRP) has the status of draft.
The draft Plan is still being written and is yet to be completed and formally notified as the ‘proposed’ LWRP. The ‘proposed’ Plan will be available late 2024 when it is scheduled for ‘public notification’. On this web page, you will find information about the proposed rules and regulations that we are considering. We have received public feedback that let us know if people thought we were heading in the right direction before the ‘proposed’ LWRP is publicly notified.
The proposed new rules are designed to protect waterways for future generations.
If you are unsure of any particular terms in the below summaries, there is a glossary of terms.
Recent content updates:
The Beds of Lakes and Rivers chapter manages all works in, on, over or under the beds of lakes and rivers, including selected activities in the riparian margin (the strip of land that runs alongside a waterway). The activities captured include:
The nature of works in the bed of lakes and rivers varies across the Otago region, as do the environments where those activities occur. The beds and margins of lakes and rivers in the region provide habitat for flora, fauna and valued mahika kai (food and resource gathering) and are an integral part of the natural character of the region.
This chapter does not manage damming and diversion in the bed, which is captured by the Damming and Diversion chapter.
Overview and key changes
The table below provides a high-level comparison of the operative Water Plan provisions with those included in the draft Beds of Lakes and Rivers chapter and highlights the key changes from the operative Water Plan.
Beds of Lakes and Rivers chapter of draft LWRP |
Existing plan |
---|---|
Permitted activity framework |
|
Key changes: Permitted activity rules capture similar activities, but have been refined to capture all associated disturbance, discharge, deposition, and land use requirements so that users do not need to consult multiple parts of the plan.
Permitted activity criteria are similar to the Water Plan but have been simplified and aligned with other standard conditions in the LWRP. For example, conditions seek to ensure that:
Use of existing structures are permitted if:
If the activity does not comply with the above permitted activity conditions, a restricted discretionary activity will be required. ORC’s discretion will be restricted to the actual and potential environmental effects of not meeting the relevant conditions of the rule, the lapsing period and duration of the resource consent, review of the conditions of the resource consent, the need for a bond, and the collection, recording, monitoring, and provision of information about the exercise of the resource consent. Where possible, activities that are beneficial for water body health (for example sediment traps) will continue to be permitted if conditions are met. All suction dredge mining will require consent. No consent required for some bank reshaping (i.e., to repair flood damage). The new provision for bank reshaping makes it simpler to understand and provides greater clarity for how the activity should be completed. Stock crossing will be managed under the Stock Exclusion Regulations 2020. The person responsible must ensure that the stock are supervised and actively driven across the lake or wide river. This includes:
|
The permitted activity rules are extensive, and provide a pathway for various types of activities in the beds of lakes and rivers, including:
|
General consenting requirements |
|
Key changes: Activities that do not comply with permitted activity rules are generally classified as discretionary.
Stronger policy guidance to inform decision-making on consent applications. This includes direction on:
|
Most activities that do not comply with the permitted activity rules are classified as restricted discretionary. The matters of discretion are broad, and supporting policy direction is uncertain. |
Flood protection and drainage infrastructure works |
|
Key changes: Policy and rule pathways included that are specifically for flood protection and drainage infrastructure works undertaken by or on behalf of Council. Use and some maintenance of flood protection and drainage infrastructure works undertaken by persons other than Council is permitted (subject to similar conditions as outlined above for activities in beds). Any alteration, placement or replacement of flood protection and drainage infrastructure by or on behalf of Council requires consent. |
No specific policy or rule direction for flood protection and drainage infrastructure works undertaken by or on behalf of ORC, so captured under general rule framework. Many works require consent. |
Gravel extraction
|
|
Key changes: Reduced volume for permitted gravel extractions to 5 cubic metres in all rivers and lakes. Discretionary consent required for all other extractions. Clear policy direction on managing gravel extraction requiring:
Policy signalling development of catchment specific guidance and a Code of Practice which will describe good management practices for gravel extraction. This direction will be implemented by way of a future change to the Land and Water Regional Plan. |
The permitted activity rule is very permissive and enables substantial gravel extraction for all rivers up to a volume of 20 cubic metres with no evidential basis for the volumes allowed. Limited policy direction to inform decision-making on consent applications for gravel extraction.
|
Damming and diversion manages dams, weirs, and diversions, including activities associated with their placement, maintenance, and removal. The activities captured include:
Damming occurs throughout Otago for a range of purposes (such as providing drinking water, generating hydro-electric power, harvesting, and storing water, irrigation and treating stormwater). Dams in the region vary in size and age, and are in rivers, lakes, and wetlands (in-stream) and outside of these water bodies (off-stream). Weirs are also used to raise the level of water upstream or regulate its flow, and the diversion of water occurs in the region and involves redirecting the flow of water.
The table below provides a high-level comparison of the provisions of the operative Water Plan provisions with those included in the draft Damming and Diversion chapter and highlights the key changes from the operative Water Plan.
Damming and Diversion chapter of draft LWRP | Existing plan |
---|---|
Damming |
|
Key changes: New definitions for different types of damming structures and activities that are aligned with national direction and the Building Act 2004. Separate rules for off-stream and in-stream dams and weirs. Separate rules for temporary and longer-term damming. Off-stream dams are permitted if:
If the off-stream dam does not comply with the above permitted activity conditions, a discretionary consent will be required. Activities captured by the following rules include placement of the dam or weir, and any associated damming or diversion, use and disturbance of the bed of a lake or river, and discharge of water or contaminants into water. New temporary in-stream dams and weirs (in place for no longer than 30 days) are permitted if:
If the temporary in-stream dam or weir does not comply with the above permitted activity conditions (except for where damming is prohibited), a discretionary consent will be required. New longer-term in-stream dams and weirs (in place for longer than 30 days) are a discretionary activity provided they are not located in an area where damming is prohibited.
Use of in-stream dams and weirs that existed on 1 July 2024 is permitted if:
If the activity does not comply with the above permitted activity conditions, a discretionary consent will be required. Maintenance of lawfully established in-stream dams and weirs is permitted provided there is no increase in the volume of water impounded or the footprint of the dam or weir, and many of the same conditions as placement are met i.e., complying with environmental flows and levels, not affecting lawful water takes, not disturbing indigenous birds etc. If the activity is unable to comply with the permitted activity conditions, a discretionary consent will be required. Removal of in-stream dams and weirs is permitted if:
Clear policy direction for restricting the construction of new in-stream dams and weirs but facilitating off-stream dams
Clear policy direction on managing the effects of damming activities and recognising hydro-electricity generation. |
Same rules apply to all damming activities regardless of location, type, or duration. Damming (whether or not it is off-stream or instream) is permitted if:
If the activity does not comply with the above permitted activity conditions, then consent is required (except where damming is prohibited). Activity status ranges from restricted discretionary to non-complying depending on what conditions can’t be met. Limited policy direction to guide the management of damming activities. Definitions are unclear. Provisions are not aligned with national direction and the Building Act 2004. |
Diversion |
|
Key changes:
Definitions clarify that diverting water outside the bed of a water body, even if non-consumptive, is managed as a take and discharge of water rather than a diversion.
Separate diversion rules supported by policy direction focusing on ensuring that fish passage is provided for, diversions are kept to the smallest practicable extent, and they have minor or transitory adverse effects on the environment.
Diversion rules distinguish between diversions of water outside of the bed of a water body (e.g., to alleviate flooding) and those within a water body (e.g., to facilitate temporary works on a structure).
Diversions where they occur fully outside of the bed of a lake or river are permitted if:
Diversions within the bed of a lake or river are permitted if:
If the activity does not comply with the above permitted activity conditions, a discretionary consent will be required (except where diversions are prohibited e.g., areas protected by water conservation orders or legislation and in Lake Tuakitoto as per the Water Plan). |
Diversion rules bundled with damming rules. A diversion is permitted if:
Diversions related to lawful structures are a permitted activity if:
Diversion of water from water bodies not consistently managed as a ‘take of water.’ |
Associated activities |
|
Key changes: All relevant activities associated with the damming or diversion of water; for example, disturbance of the bed of a lake or river, discharge of water or contaminants, and damming or diversion etc. are managed under the same rules in the DAM chapter and are permitted or consented along with the primary activity.
|
Multiple rules spread across different Water Plan chapters apply for various activities associated with damming and diversion e.g., structures, bed disturbance, discharges of water and contaminants etc. |
Recent content updates:
The Earthworks and Drilling chapter manages the disturbance of land and associated discharges. Activities captured include:
These activities have previously been managed by the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (Water Plan). Plan Change 8 (Urban Topics), which was made operative on 3 September 2022, introduced new rules to the Water Plan for managing sediment from earthworks for residential development.
This chapter does not manage stormwater or discharges from contaminated land. These are covered in the Stormwater and Other Discharges chapters, respectively.
The table below provides a high-level comparison of the existing Water Plan provisions and the draft Earthworks and Drilling chapter and highlights the key changes from the Water Plan.
The table below provides a high-level comparison of the existing Water Plan provisions and the draft EARTH chapter and highlights the key changes from the Water Plan.
Earthworks and Drilling chapter of draft LWRP | Existing plan |
---|---|
Earthworks |
|
The existing permitted activity rule for earthworks now applies to all earthworks.
For earthworks to be permitted, they must not:
OR
OR
The setback distances in the above rules do not apply to earthworks for riparian planting. If the earthworks do not comply with the above permitted activity conditions, a discretionary consent will be required and, if granted, will require best practice sediment control measures to be undertaken in accordance with an erosion and sediment control plan. |
Rule framework for managing sediment discharges from residential construction only.
Earthworks are permitted if:
If earthworks do not meet all of the conditions listed above, a discretionary consent is required. |
Drilling |
|
Key changes: The drilling of land for purposes other than the construction of a bore is permitted if the drilling:
The drilling of a new bore, or drilling to alter or replace an existing bore, will require controlled consent, which will be granted if:
ORC will be able to set consent conditions on the following matters:
|
The drilling of land for purposes other than the construction of a bore is permitted if the drilling:
The drilling of a new bore requires consent as a controlled activity. ORC must grant consent but may impose conditions relating to:
|
Bores |
|
The use of an existing bore is permitted if:
If an existing bore does not comply with the conditions above, a controlled consent must be sought which may require the bore to be repaired or altered to ensure groundwater quality is protected. |
The use of an existing bore is currently not managed by the Water Plan. |
Site investigation |
|
The new framework supports the identification and recording of contaminated land by allowing site investigations to occur if they comply with the Contaminated Land Management Guidelines No. 1: Reporting on Contaminated Sites in New Zealand, (Ministry for the Environment, 2021), and are reported to ORC within 2 months of completion.
|
The disturbance of land for a site investigation to assess concentrations of hazardous substances is currently not managed by the Water Plan. |
Recent content updates:
The Environmental Flows, Levels and Limits chapter of the draft Land and Water Regional Plan manages:
The table below provides a high-level comparison of the existing Water Plan and the draft Environmental Flows, Levels and Limits chapter and highlights key changes from the Water Plan. The Freshwater Management Unit (FMU) chapter summaries contain the specific environmental flows and levels and limits for water bodies contained within each FMU.
The level of impact of the changes from the existing plan to the draft LWRP will vary across FMU and rohe (areas) in Otago depending on the circumstances of allocation and water uses in different water bodies.
Environmental Flows, Levels and Limits chapter of draft LWRP |
Existing plan |
---|---|
River catchments | |
Environmental flows and take limits set for all rivers according to the following:
Better policy direction around the setting of site-specific environmental flow conditions on consents (in the current planning framework referred to as ‘residual flows’) to protect locally present or downstream values. |
|
Lakes | |
New consented takes, diversions, damming or discharges of water from natural lakes and their upper catchment will be a prohibited activity. Takes from lakes will generally be included within a single take limit that applies to the lake as well as the river catchment that the lake is part of. This is consistent with a holistic and integrated management approach (ki uta ki tai - mountains to sea). The exception is lakes where a specific take limit and/or minimum level has been set such as some instream artificial lakes (e.g. Lakes Dunstan, Roxburgh, Onslow, Mahinerangi), and two natural lakes (Whakatipu and Wānaka), and natural lakes with an upper catchment that is highly modified through hydro-electricity generation, for example Lake Waipōuri. |
|
Groundwater | |
Environmental levels and take limits are set for taking water from different types of aquifers:
|
|
Avoiding over-allocation | |
|
|
Phasing out over-allocation | |
Key changes: In region-wide provisions, two stage approach to phasing out existing over-allocation will include policy direction and mandatory rule conditions for the replacement of consents in over-allocated water bodies:
River catchments with bespoke take limits may have different requirements under the 2-staged approach:
|
The Water Plan has sinking lid policies to reduce allocation that partly rely on voluntary actions and is not likely to reduce the consented allocation to environmentally sustainable levels. |
Different types of freshwater takes | |
|
|
Specific activities | |
|
No directive policy guidance for specific activities |
Efficiency considerations | |
|
Limited policy direction on how to consider efficiency when assessing an application for a water take |
Integrated management and group management of water takes | |
|
|
Consideration of applications | |
|
|
Rule framework | |
|
|
*Paper allocation is any quantity of water that is allocated under a resource consent but that exceeds the actual (recorded) rate of take or volume of water taken by the consent.
The Other Discharges chapter of the draft LWRP includes rules and provisions to effectively manage a range of specific discharges that do not neatly fit into other chapters in the plan. Discharges of contaminants and water into the environment (either directly to water or to land) can adversely affect the health of soils and water, as well as the health of the ecosystems they support.
The table below provides a high-level comparison of the existing Water and Waste Plan provisions with those included in the draft Other Discharges chapter and highlights the key changes from the status quo.
Other Discharges chapter of draft LWRP | Existing plan |
---|---|
Discharges of agrichemicals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dust suppressants
|
|
|
|
Tracer dye |
|
|
|
Discharges of swimming and spa pool water |
|
|
*CFU stands for Colony Forming Units. A colony-forming unit is where a colony of microbes grow from one single microbe. It is a measuring method that allows a scientist to examine a sample under a microscope and count the number of viable bacteria in a 100ml sample of water.
|
Discharges from water treatment and filter backwash |
|
|
|
Discharges from emergency firefighting training |
|
|
|
Discharges of water used for holding live organisms |
|
|
|
Passive discharges from contaminated land |
|
|
Not managed under the Water or Waste Plans. |
Cemeteries |
|
|
Not managed under the Water or Waste Plans. |
Major hazard facilities |
|
|
|
Discharges not managed elsewhere |
|
|
|
Recent content updates:
Some farming activities and practices are currently managed under the provisions of the operative Regional Plan: Water for Otago (the Water Plan), although a small number of farming activities (e.g., silage, offal pits and farm landfills) are also managed under the Regional Plan: Waste for Otago (Waste Plan).
The Primary Production chapter of the draft Land and Water Regional Plan manages farming activities and practices that are likely to impact water quality, and the planting of forestry, and includes:
The provisions covered in the above are proposed to be region-wide.
The nature of farming activity varies widely across the Otago region, as do the environments within which those activities occur. Therefore, the draft LWRP also contains a suite of tools that may be applied depending on the need for reductions of different contaminants and the timeframe within which those reductions need to be applied. These are proposed to be applied at an FMU/rohe level and the time frames are set by the environmental outcomes for each FMU. This is covered in the FMU/rohe chapters below. The FMU/rohe summaries and this summary should be read together.
Some discharges that may be associated with farming activities (such as discharges of agrichemicals or sediment discharges from earthworks) are not managed in this chapter. They are addressed in the Earthworks and Drilling and Other Discharges chapters respectively.
A freshwater farm plan is a new tool introduced in the Government’s Essential Freshwater package, to help reduce impacts on freshwater. Freshwater farm plans are certified plans that help farmers figure out how well they are doing in keeping water clean and the land healthy. Each farmer will make a plan that says what steps they will take to identify, manage and reduce any adverse impact of farming on the freshwater environment.
The table below provides a high-level comparison of the provisions of the operative Water and Waste Plans with the provisions in the Primary Production chapter of the draft LWRP and highlights the key changes from the Water and Waste Plans.
Primary Production chapter of draft LWRP |
Existing plan |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Permitted activity framework |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The provisions for effluent storage and application (introduced as a result of PC8) are carried over from the operative Water Plan.
New rules permit the use of land and associated discharges for:
Silage storage, offal pits – subject to conditions, including:
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General consenting requirements | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PC8 provisions being carried over.
If permitted activity conditions cannot be met, the activity requires a discretionary consent, with stronger policy guidance to inform consent applications. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Freshwater Farm Plans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clear policy direction to ensure that the actions proposed in FWFPs are focussed on meeting desired environmental outcomes.
Permitted activity pathway that allows for the effects of some activities to be managed in accordance with certified FWFPs as an alternative to a consenting pathway.
These activities include:
Some information requirements, in addition to the FWFP actions plans, to be submitted to Council. Information to be provided includes stocking rate, area of arable farming and crop type, fertiliser use, imported supplementary feed utilised, effective farming area, outputs from the nutrient budget or nutrient risk assessment, area of intensive winter grazing, duration of intensive winter grazing, crop type and stocking rate, and area of pasture wintering, stocking rate and kgs per hectare DM of supplementary feed. |
Freshwater Farm Plans (FWFP) are not included in the Water Plan. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Planting of plantation and permanent forestry | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Any existing Water Plan provisions that are more stringent than the NES-PF will be retained. This stringency relates to the management of discharges to water, and some works in the bed of lakes, rivers and wetlands. Plantation forestry will be a permitted activity where it is less than 10 hectares in area, and the setbacks below are met:
Permanent forestry will be a permitted activity where only indigenous species are planted, and the setbacks below are met:
Where a resource consent is required for plantation or permanent forestry, it is typically a restricted discretionary activity and the matters for discretion include effects on water quantity, effects on water quality, management of wilding trees, and effects on freshwater and freshwater ecosystems. It is anticipated that most exotic forestry planting will require resource consent, while indigenous forestry is enabled. |
The operative Water Plan does not currently contain specific provisions for the management of the planting of plantation or permanent forestry. However, there are some rules or conditions of rules in the operative Water Plan (rules for managing discharge to water) that apply in addition to the National Environmental Standard for Plantation Forestry (NES-PF).
The NES-PF manages the planting of plantation forestry, but the setbacks to water bodies are relatively small (5-10 metres for rivers and wetlands, 30 metres for the coastal marine area), and there is no consideration of effects on water quantity where a resource consent is required. |
The Stormwater Management chapter manages discharges of stormwater: rainwater and meltwater runoff from surfaces such as roofs, driveways, carparks, and roads. Urban areas, with numerous buildings and paved surfaces, face challenges because the water cannot permeate the ground, leading to potential flooding and contamination of the receiving environment – rivers, lakes, and the sea.
The chapter manages discharges from:
These discharges have previously been managed by the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (Water Plan). Plan Change 8 (operative from 9 July 2022) improved the policy direction for stormwater by requiring progressive reduction of sewage overflows in stormwater, and measures to control the quantity and quality of stormwater to reflect current best practice, to contribute towards improving water quality in the Otago Region.
This chapter does not manage stormwater from construction and earthworks, which is managed in the Earthworks chapter.
The table below provides a high-level comparison of the existing Water Plan provisions with those included in the draft Stormwater chapter and highlights the key changes from the Water Plan.
Stormwater chapter of draft LWRP |
Existing plan |
---|---|
Network discharges | |
Key changes:
|
It is permitted to discharge stormwater from a reticulated system to water, if:
|
Non-network discharges | |
Key changes:
|
It is permitted to discharge stormwater from a road which is not connected to a stormwater system, if:
|
The threatened species topic:
The Otago region has a rich and varied freshwater biodiversity. Some of this biodiversity has been lost or degraded due to adverse effects from introduced species, human activities, and ongoing resource use and development. Many of Otago’s freshwater species are threatened with extinction, and little is known of their habitats, threats, distributions, and the actions needed to recover from the threat of extinction.
The NPS-FM 2020 defines threatened species to mean any indigenous species of flora or fauna that:
Regional councils are required to:
The LWRP will protect threatened species and their habitats by:
For the LWRP, a list of 140 candidate species were assessed against the threatened species definition and refined to a list of 78 species of threatened species. The 78 threatened species include plants, fish, birds, a bat, and invertebrates that are reliant on water bodies in Otago and are listed below.
You can also see the locations of threatened species in the map below. You can zoom in and view the various threatened species in an Otago area(s).
The areas with threatened species are depicted in a orange-like colour.
When you have zoomed in and selected an area, threatened species information will appear.
if browsing from a mobile device, after zooming in and selecting an area, select the box icon (next to the 'X' icon) to view the species in the area.
Threatened freshwater-dependent species of Otago:
Scientific name | Common name(s) |
---|---|
Plants | |
Althenia bilocularis | |
Amphibromus fluitans | Water brome |
Brachyscome linearis | |
Cardamine mutabilis | |
Carex capillacea | Sedge |
Carex cirrhosa | Curly Sedge |
Carex rubicunda | Sedge |
Carex strictissima | Bastard grass, hook sedge |
Chaerophyllum colensoi var. delicatulum (CHR 73872; Hauhungaroa Range) | mountain myrrh |
Chenopodium detestans | New Zealand fish-guts plant |
Coprosma obconica | |
Crassula multicaulis | |
Crassula peduncularis | |
Eryngium vesiculosum | Sea holly, coastal eryngo |
Euchiton ensifer | Creeping Cudweed |
Gratiola concinna | |
Hypericum rubicundulum | |
Juncus pauciflorus | leafless rush |
Korthalsella salicornioides | Mistletoe, dwarf mistletoe, leafless mistletoe |
Lagenophora montana | papataniwha |
Leptospermum scoparium var. scoparium | manuka, tea tree, kahikatoa |
Libertia peregrinans | New Zealand iris, mikoikoi |
Lophomyrtus obcordata | Rohutu, New Zealand myrtle |
Mazus novaezeelandiae subsp. impolitus f. impolitus | dwarf musk/matt leaved mazus |
Melicytus flexuosus | |
Metrosideros diffusa | white rata |
Metrosideros umbellata | Southern rata |
Myosurus minimus subsp. novae-zelandiae | New Zealand mousetail, bearded mousetail |
Neomyrtus pedunculata | Rohutu, myrtle |
Ourisia modesta | Creeping Foxglove |
Pittosporum obcordatum | Heart-leaved kohuhu |
Puccinellia raroflorens | Saltgrass |
Ranunculus brevis | |
Ranunculus recens | |
Ranunculus ternatifolius | |
Tetrachondra hamiltonii | |
Triglochin palustris | marsh arrow grass |
Trithuria brevistyla | |
Wurmbea novae-zelandiae | |
Bats |
|
Chalinolobus tuberculatus | Long-tailed bat |
Birds |
|
Anas superciliosa | grey duck, pārera, |
Ardea modesta | white heron, kōtuku, |
Botaurus poiciloptilus | Australasian bittern, matuku hūrepo, |
Chlidonias albostriatus | black-fronted tern, tarapirohe, tarapiroe |
Egretta sacra sacra | reef heron, matuku moana, |
Himantopus novaezelandiae | black stilt, kakī, |
Hydroprogne caspia | Caspian tern, taranui, |
Hymenolaimus malacorhynchos | whio, blue duck, whio, kōwhiowhio (Ngāi Tahu), kowhiowhio, blue duck, mountain duck, blue mountain duck |
Podiceps cristatus australis | Australasian crested grebe, southern crested grebe, great crested grebe, pūteketeke, puteketeke, kamana, kāmana |
Fish | |
Galaxias "Nevis" | Nevis galaxias (Nevis River) |
Galaxias "Pomahaka" | Pomahaka galaxias (Pomahaka River) |
Galaxias "southern" | Southern flathead galaxias (Southland, Otago) |
Galaxias "species D" | Clutha flathead galaxias (Clutha River) |
Galaxias "Teviot" | Teviot flathead galaxias (Teviot River) |
Galaxias aff. paucispondylus "Manuherikia" | Alpine galaxias (Manuherikia River) |
Galaxias aff. paucispondylus "Southland" | Alpine galaxias (Southland) |
Galaxias anomalus | Central Otago roundhead galaxias |
Galaxias cobitinis | Lowland longjaw galaxias (Kākaunui River) |
Galaxias depressiceps | Taieri flathead galaxias |
Galaxias eldoni | Eldon’s galaxias |
Galaxias gollumoides | Gollum galaxias |
Galaxias pullus | Dusky galaxias |
Geotria australis | Lamprey |
Neochanna burrowsius | Canterbury mudfish |
Invertebrates | |
Maoricrambus oncobolus | Moth |
Edpercivalia tahatika | caddisfly |
Eulimnadia marplesi | clam shrimp |
Kiwisaldula laelaps | shore bug |
Nesoperla patricki | stonefly |
Oeconesus angustus | caddisfly |
Olinga fumosa | caddis |
Pseudoeconesus n. sp. T | caddisfly |
Pseudoeconesus paludis | caddisfly |
Taraperla johnsi | stonefly |
Vesicaperla trilinea | stonefly |
Zelandobius crawfordi | stonefly |
Zelandobius edwardsi | stonefly |
Zelandobius mariae | stonefly |
The Solid Waste Management chapter manages the disposal of certain types of solid waste to land in circumstances where it may enter water. The types of wastes captured by the provisions of this chapter include discharges from:
The disposal of these types of solid waste is currently managed by the Regional Plan: Waste for Otago (Waste Plan). Plan Change 1 (PC1) to the Waste Plan (operative from 9 July 2022) strengthened the policy direction for establishing and managing certain classes of landfill to reflect current best practice and to contribute towards improving water quality in the Otago Region.
This chapter does not manage liquid wastes (managed through Other Discharges), or agricultural waste and farm landfills (managed through Primary Production).
The table below provides a high-level comparison of the provisions of the operative Waste Plan with those included in the draft Solid Waste Management chapter and highlights the key changes from the Waste Plan.
Solid Waste Management chapter of draft LWRP |
Existing plan |
---|---|
Landfill | |
Closed landfills Existing approach generally retained with some amendments. Key changes:
|
Closed landfills do not require a consent if closed before 1991. Closed landfills require a consent and a closure plan if closed after 1991. |
Existing and new landfills No changes. PC1 introduced management in accordance with Waste Management Institute New Zealand’s Technical Guidelines for Disposal to Land (October 2022), which is considered best practice, therefore no changes are needed. |
Existing and new landfills Existing and new landfills require a discretionary consent and must comply with Waste Management Institute New Zealand’s Technical Guidelines for Disposal to Land (October 2022). |
Clean fill | |
Key changes: No consent needed if the discharge meets specific requirements including:
If the above permitted activity conditions are not met, a discretionary consent is required. |
No consent needed provided no sediment enters water. If sediment enters the water, a discretionary consent is needed. |
Organic waste (green waste and compost) | |
Key changes:
If the permitted activity conditions are not met, a discretionary consent is required. |
No consent is needed for the disposal of green waste if no leachate enters a water body. If the permitted activity conditions are not met, a discretionary consent is required.
No consent is needed for the disposal of compost if 51% of the material is generated from the same property. If the permitted activity conditions are not met, a discretionary consent is required. |
Recent content updates:
The Wastewater Management chapter manages discharges from the treatment of sewage, greywater, and industrial and trade waste. The discharges captured include those from:
These discharges have previously been managed by the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (Water Plan). Plan Change 8 (operative from 9 July 2022) improved the policy direction for reticulated wastewater to prefer discharges to land over discharges to water, and to reflect current best practice to contribute towards improving water quality in the Otago Region.
This chapter does not manage animal effluent, which is managed in the Primary Production chapters, or vegetative compos, which is managed in the Solid Waste Management chapter.
The table below provides a high-level comparison of the existing plan provisions and the draft Wastewater chapter and highlights the key changes from the Regional Plan: Water for Otago.
Wastewater chapter of draft LWRP |
Existing plan |
---|---|
Reticulated wastewater (municipal and privately owned and operated networks) | |
Existing systems Key changes:
|
Existing systems
|
New systems Key changes:
|
New systems
|
Biosolids
|
Biosolids Not managed in the Water Plan
|
Industrial and trade waste | |
No consent needed to discharge to land, if the discharge meets all the following permitted activity conditions:
If the activity does not meet all the permitted activity conditions, a discretionary consent is required.
|
The discharge of industrial and trade waste to water or land requires discretionary consent.
|
Onsite wastewater (septic tanks) | |
Key changes: If there is an available reticulated wastewater system available, discharges from any (existing or new) onsite system are not permitted.
Existing systems Existing systems are permitted if the discharge is:
If the above conditions are not met, the discharge requires a discretionary consent.
New systems New systems are permitted if the discharge is:
If the above conditions are not met, the discharge requires a discretionary consent.
|
If the system was installed before 1998, no consent is needed if:
If the system was installed after 1998, consent is required if:
If the above conditions are not met, the discharge requires a discretionary consent.
|
Pit toilets (long drops) No consent needed for existing pit toilet if:
If the above conditions are not met, the discharge requires a discretionary consent.
No consent needed for new pit toilet if:
If the above conditions are not met, the discharge requires a discretionary consent. |
Pit toilets (long drops) Discharges from pit toilets constructed before 1998 are permitted.
Discharges from pit toilets constructed after 1998 are permitted if the discharge is:
If the above conditions are not met, the discharge requires a discretionary consent.
|
Composting toilets No consent needed to discharge to land if:
If the above conditions are not met, the discharge requires a discretionary consent. |
Not managed in Water Plan.
|
Onsite greywater No consent required to discharge to land if:
If the activity does not meet the permitted activity conditions, a discretionary consent is required. |
Onsite greywater
|
The Wetlands chapter manages activities in or near wetlands (including ‘natural inland wetlands’ as they are defined in the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020, but also wetlands more broadly). The chapter works in conjunction with the controls on natural inland wetlands in the National Environmental Standard for Freshwater (NES-F), which includes controls on the removal of vegetation, earthworks, drainage, and discharges into natural inland wetlands, and the Resource Management (Stock Exclusion) Regulations 2020. The majority of controls on wetlands are included in the national documents. The Wetlands chapter has two additional controls:
Otago has a diverse range of wetlands. These provide valuable habitat for flora, fauna and valued mahika kai, and are an integral part of the natural character of the region. Wetlands and wetland values are sensitive to loss from a range of activities.
The creation of new wetlands is supported, and new wetlands are likely to have wide ranging benefits for water quality, biodiversity and natural hazard reduction.
Alongside the development of provisions for managing wetlands in the draft Land and Water Regional Plan, the Otago Regional Council is undertaking the identification and mapping of wetlands as required by the NPSFM.
For natural inland wetlands, the provisions of the Resource Management (Stock Exclusion) Regulations 2020 and the NES-F apply. The plan can be more stringent, but these regulations provide a range of compulsory protections.
The table below provides a high-level comparison of the existing provisions of the operative Water Plan, the NES-F, the Resource Management (Stock Exclusion) Regulations 2020 and the draft WET chapter in the draft LWRP highlighting the key differences.
Wetlands chapter of draft LWRP |
Existing NES-F and Stock Exclusion Regulations and Water Plan |
---|---|
Wetland types | |
The proposed rules define a wider range of natural wetlands and require resource consent for activities that that are likely to permanently destroy them. The activities that will require a restricted discretionary resource consent in this wider range of natural wetlands are:
Stock are not required to be excluded from this wider range of natural wetlands but are from natural inland wetlands (see row below). This wider range of natural wetlands are included in the definition of ‘critical source area’. This has two implications:
|
The NES-F manages ‘natural inland wetlands’ only. The definition of ‘natural inland wetlands’ excludes any wetland that has more than 50% of exotic pasture species and is within an area of pasture used for grazing, unless the wetland is located with a habitat of a threatened species. Identifying and mapping wetlands under this definition has proven difficult and resource and time consuming. This leaves many wetlands unprotected, more so in advance of any on-site inspection and mapping. |
Stock exclusion | |
In addition to cattle, pigs and deer, other heavy livestock, such as horses, but not sheep or goats, are also required to be excluded from natural inland wetlands.
A discretionary activity resource consent can be sought for access to natural inland wetlands by these additional livestock types. However, cattle, pigs and deer are managed by the Stock Exclusion Regulations and those regulations do not provide a resource consent option.
There continue to be no stock exclusion requirements for sheep or goats. |
The Stock Exclusion Regulations require cattle, pigs and deer to be excluded from natural inland wetlands on low slope land by July 2025 and on any slope if it is a wetland specifically listed in a regional or district plan or supports a population of threatened species. |
Regionally significant wetlands | |
The existing Regionally Significant Wetlands will continue to be mapped, and the mapping will be updated as the mapping of wetlands that the Council is undertaking is completed.
These existing Regionally Significant Wetlands will be managed under the NES-F and Stock Exclusion Regulations where they are natural inland wetlands, and under the rules restricting cultivation, herbicide spraying, earthworks and new drainage, along with Freshwater Farm Plans, for other natural wetlands. |
These are mapped and some specific controls apply. These controls have largely been superseded by the NES-F and the Stock Exclusion Regulations. |
We have:
Select the FMU or rohe you are interested in to view the proposed new rules and regulations for the specific area.
If you are unsure of any particular terms, there is a glossary of terms.
Please note: we are updating the material regularly to improve clarity.
The Clutha/Mata-au in Otago is the largest area for managing freshwater. It's divided into five smaller zones called "rohe" to better involve local communities in decisions.
Within the Clutha Mata-Au FMU, the Dunstan Rohe runs from the outlets of lakes Wānaka, Whakatipu and Hāwea down to Clyde Dam and includes the Kawarau, Nevis, Shotover, Upper Clutha/Mata-au, Hāwea, Cardrona, Arrow, and Lindis Rivers.
Within the Clutha Mata-Au FMU, the Lower Clutha Rohe includes the Pomahaka catchment, as well as several other river catchments that feed the Clutha/Mata-au.
Within the Clutha Mata-Au FMU, the Manuherekia Rohe is based on the catchment area of the Manuherekia River.
Within the Clutha Mata-Au FMU, the Roxburgh Rohe extends from the Clyde Dam to Beaumont, and covers Alexandra, Clyde, and Roxburgh.
The North Otago Freshwater Management Unit (FMU) covers about 296,000 hectares and extends from Waitaki Bridge down through Oamaru, Moeraki, and Palmerston townships to the bottom of the southern branch of the Waikouaiti River.
The Taiari/Taieri Freshwater Management Unit (FMU) covers the entire Taiari/Taieri River catchment, reaching from Taiari/Taieri Mouth across the Taiari/Taieri Plain into the Strath Taiari/Taieri and Maniototo Basins.
Within the Clutha Mata-Au FMU, the Upper Lakes Rohe covers the lakes of Whakatipu, Wānaka and Hāwea, from their tributaries to their outlets and is around 7,000 square kilometres.
The Dunedin & Coast Freshwater Management Unit (FMU) spans over 1,000 square kilometres and runs from just south of Karitane down to the mouth of the Clutha/Mata-Au.
The Catlins Freshwater Management Unit (FMU) is located along the southern coast of Otago.
The Integrated management and Land and Freshwater chapters provide the strategic direction for the draft LWRP and are relevant to the management of all activities under the plan. Both chapters contain objectives and policies but not rules.
The Integrated Management chapter focuses on:
The Land and freshwater chapter focuses on:
The strategic direction in the draft LWRP is a significant shift from comparable direction in the Water Plan. The key issues with the current state, and drivers for change, include:
The objectives and policies of the Water Plan focus on ‘balancing’ resource use against protection of those resources, which has been replaced by the concept of Te Mana o te Wai and the hierarchy of obligations. This is a fundamental shift from the philosophy that underpinned the Water Plan when it was written.
The Water Plan focuses primarily on water and contains little direction on managing the land uses that contribute to freshwater issues, particularly for water quality and ecosystem health. There is also limited recognition of the relationships between fresh and coastal water, and ground and surface water.
A suite of mandatory policies is required to be included in regional plans by the NPSFM. These apply to many different activities and therefore need to be part of the strategic direction of the plan.
The Water Plan does not specifically address climate change or the future impacts on water availability in some parts of the region. This will be increasingly important for decision-making over the life of the plan.
The well-being of mahika kai (food and resource gathering) and taoka (treasures), and protection of other cultural values is rarely given effect to in environmental policy or decision-making processes under the operative Water Plan and these considerations are often compromised in favour of other values, including economic values.
Term |
Definition |
7-day mean annual low flow (MALF)
|
The average, for a number of years, of the lowest average flow over seven consecutive days in each year. The lowest average flow over seven consecutive days in each year is determined by calculating the average flow over seven consecutive days for every seven consecutive day period in the year and choosing the lowest. |
Agrichemical |
Any substance whether inorganic or organic, man-made or naturally occurring, modified or in its original state, that is used to eradicate, modify, or control flora and fauna. For the purpose of this Plan, it includes agricultural compounds, but excludes oral nutrition compounds, vertebrate toxic agents, and fertilisers. |
Agricultural solid waste |
Agricultural waste that exhibits the properties of a solid, e.g., it can be stacked and hold a definite angle of repose. For the purposes of the Plan, if any waste does not meet the definition of agricultural solid waste it is treated as agricultural liquid waste. |
Agricultural waste |
The waste from the customary and generally accepted activities, practices, and procedures that farmers and producers adopt, use, or engage in during the production and preparation for market of poultry, livestock, and associated farm products; and in the production and harvesting of agricultural crops that include agronomic, horticultural, silvicultural, viticultural and aquaculture activities. In addition, winery wastewater and grape marc constitutes agricultural waste. |
Animal effluent storage facility |
A pond, tank, or structure primarily used for the containment or storage of animal effluent, but excludes any ancillary structures for the collection, conveyance, or treatment of liquid or solid animal effluent, such as sumps, stone traps and weeping walls. |
Animal effluent system |
The collection, storage, or treatment, of liquid or solid animal effluent. |
Aquifer pump testing |
A test made by pumping a well for a period of time and observing the change in water level or pressure in the aquifer. A pumping test may be used to determine the capacity of the well, the hydraulic characteristic of the aquifer or any interference effects. |
Artificial water course |
A watercourse that is deliberately created by human action (including an irrigation canal, water supply race, canal for the supply of water for electricity power generation, farm drainage canal, drain, or duck pond) provided that it is not part of a water body or a modified watercourse. |
Available reticulated wastewater system |
A community or municipal reticulated wastewater system which: (1) passes within 30 metres of the property boundary: or, (2) passes 60 metres of the closest building on a property; and (3) the system has existed in that location for more than 12 months. |
Biosolids |
Sludge derived from a wastewater treatment plant that has been treated and/or stabilised to the extent that it is able to be safely and beneficially applied to land. |
Cascading hazards |
Where the occurrence of one natural hazard is likely to trigger another natural hazard event e.g., an earthquake triggering a landslide which dams a river causing flooding. |
Classifiable dam |
A dam that: (a) has a height of 4 or more metres and stores 20,000 or more cubic metres volume of water or other fluid; or (b) has a height of 1 or more metres and stores 40,000 or more cubic metres volume of water or other fluid. For the purpose of this definition: (a) the height of the dam is the vertical distance from the crest of the dam and must be measured: (i) in the case of a dam across a water body, from the natural bed of the water body at the lowest downstream outside limit of the dam; and (ii) in the case of a dam not across a water body, from the lowest elevation at the outside limit of the dam; and (iii) in the case of a canal, from the invert of the canal; and (b) in measuring a dam’s stored volume, the stored volume of water or other fluid does not include: (i) in the case of a dam across a water body, water or fluid that is lower than the natural ground level at the lowest downstream outside limit of the dam; and (ii) in the case of a dam not across a water body, water or fluid that is lower than the natural ground level at the lowest elevation at the outside limit of the dam; and (iii) in the case of a canal where the canal invert (the lowest point of the inside of the canal structure that stores water or fluid) is below the natural ground level, water or fluid that is lower than the natural ground level at the lowest elevation at the outside limit of the canal structure. |
Climate change adaptation |
The process of adjustment to actual or expected climate and its effects. |
Climate change mitigation |
A human intervention to reduce the sources of, or enhance the sinks of, greenhouse gases. |
Closed landfill |
Any landfill that no longer accepts solid waste for disposal. |
Community water supply |
Water taken and used primarily to supply drinking water to users via a reticulated system, with water also supplied for other purposes including institutional, industrial, and commercial processing, cultivation, and production of food and beverages and fibre, animal drinking water purposes, amenity irrigation use and fire-fighting activities. The supply of domestic water must constitute at least 50% of the water supplied. |
Composting toilet |
A toilet system that uses a predominantly aerobic processing system that treats human excreta, typically with no water, via composting or managed aerobic decomposition. |
Construction phase stormwater |
Water, sediment, and entrained contaminants resulting from precipitation on exposed or unstabilised land and which arises from construction or demolition activities, or the development of land. |
Controlled lake |
A lake that is located within the bed of a river where the outflow of the lake is controlled by artificial means. |
Cross-mixing |
The introduction of water from one water body into another water body, where there is no natural connection between those water bodies. |
Cultivation |
Preparing land for growing pasture or a crop by mechanical tillage, direct drilling, herbicide spraying, or herbicide spraying followed by over-sowing for pasture or forage crops (colloquially referred to as ‘spray and pray’), but excludes: (a) herbicide spraying undertaken solely for the control of pest plant species. |
Dairy Effluent Storage Calculator |
The Dairy Effluent Storage Calculator available from http://www.dairynzdesc.co.nz |
Dam |
A structure used or to be used for the purpose of impounding water (and any substances dissolved in, suspended, or otherwise combined with the water) or water body. |
Damming |
The activity of impounding water (and any substances dissolved in, suspended in or otherwise combined with the water). |
Dewatering |
The abstraction of groundwater so as to lower the water table: (a) for the period of time required to enable excavation, construction, maintenance, or geotechnical work to proceed in the dewatered area; or (b) to sustain a lower localised water table. |
Diversion |
The purposeful redirecting of water flow from its natural or existing direction of flow. For the purposes of this Plan, taking water from the bed of any water body, even if only for a short distance before it is returned, is considered a take and discharge. |
Drilling |
A method of boring a hole into the ground predominantly by rotating, percussive or washing action. Excludes excavation of pits by digging, blasting or other forms of excavation, driven posts or driven solid pile. |
Effects management hierarchy (in relation to indigenous biodiversity) |
The effects management hierarchy set out in ECO-P6 of the ORPS. |
Effects management hierarchy (in relation to natural inland wetlands and rivers) |
The effects management hierarchy set out in LF-FW-P13A of the ORPS. |
Environmental flows and levels |
Any minimum flows, management flows, environmental levels and minimum levels identified in this Plan that apply to a waterbody. |
Environmental level |
The water levels, when measured at the relevant water level monitoring site, within which a lake must be maintained, and may include minimum levels and maximum operating levels. |
Existing resource consent |
1. resource consent which has been given effect to 2. resource consent which has not been given effect to and has not lapsed; and 3. an expired resource consent continuing to be exercised under s124 of the RMA. |
Feedlot |
This has the same meaning as in the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater 2020: A stockholding area where cattle — (a) are kept for at least 80 days in any 6-month period; and (b) are fed exclusively by hand or machine. |
Flood protection and drainage infrastructure |
Any infrastructure owned or managed by ORC exercising its powers, functions and duties under the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941, the Land Drainage Act 1908, or the Local Government Act 1974, in relation to flood control and drainage. |
Flood protection and drainage infrastructure works |
Any works undertaken by or on behalf of ORC for the purpose of establishing, maintaining, altering, or removing any flood protection and drainage infrastructure. |
Fractured rock aquifers |
An aquifer which stores and transmits water through crevices, joints and fractures in an otherwise impervious rock mass, as shown in [a map to come]. |
Freshwater Management Units (FMUs) and rohe |
Otago is divided into five Freshwater Management Units (FMUs). An FMU is a water body or multiple water bodies of a manageable size where freshwater objectives and limits will be set. Rohe means ‘area’ in te reo, and is used to define distinct areas within larger FMUs. |
Hāpua (lagoon) |
A pool of water, lagoon, pond. |
Hard protection structure |
Within the coastal environment, this has the same meaning as in the Glossary of the New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement 2010 as set out below: Includes a seawall, rock revetment, groyne, breakwater, stop bank, retaining wall or comparable structure or modification to the seabed, foreshore or coastal land that has the primary purpose or effect of protecting an activity from a coastal hazard, including erosion. Outside the coastal environment, this means any structure that has the primary purpose of natural hazard risk mitigation, including: dams, weirs, riprap, stop banks, carriageways, groynes, or reservoirs. |
Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act |
The Hazardous Substances and New Organisms (HSNO) Act is a law that manages the risks that hazardous substances and new organisms pose to the health and safety of people and communities and the New Zealand environment. |
In-stream dam
|
Any dam which is located in part or in whole in, on, under or over the bed of a lake or river, or within a natural inland wetland. |
Indigenous vegetation |
Vascular and non-vascular plants that, in relation to a particular area, are native to the ecological district1 or freshwater or marine bioregion in which that area is located. |
Kaitiakitaka |
Māori Environmental Management. |
Ki uta ki tai |
The Land and Water Regional Plan will be based on a whole-of-catchment approach - ki uta ki tai - from the mountains to the sea. |
Lawfully established |
Established in accordance with and compliant with the Resource Management Act 1991 or any former legislation at the time of establishment. |
Line |
A wire or conductor (including a fibre optic cable) used or intended to be used for telecommunications or the transmission of electricity. |
Liquid animal effluent |
Faeces and urine from land-based animals, including associated process water, wash-down water, contaminants and sludge but excluding solid animal effluent. For the purposes of this definition, it does not include incidental animal effluent present in livestock processing waste streams. |
Mahika kai |
Gathering of food and natural materials by Kāi Tahu whānui in accordance with tikaka, the places where those resources are gathered, and the work, methods and cultural activities involved in obtaining them. |
Main stem |
In relation to rivers, the rivers identified in [a schedule to come] of this Plan and applies from the source of that course to the sea or confluence with another main stem but excludes any tributary. |
Management flow |
The flow, when measured at the relevant flow monitoring site, at which the taking of water from a water body is subject to reductions. |
Mātaitai reserve |
Mātaitai reserves are identified traditional fishing grounds tangata whenua have a special relationship with. |
Minimum flow |
The flow, when measured at the relevant water flow monitoring site, at which the taking of water from a water body must cease. |
Minimum level |
The water level, when measured at the relevant water level monitoring site, at which the taking of water from a water body must cease. |
Modified watercourse |
A water body that has been modified, channelled, or straightened for land drainage or other purposes. |
National Environmental Standards for Freshwater (NES-F) |
National Environmental Standards for Freshwater (NES-F). The standards regulate activities that pose risks to the health of freshwater and freshwater ecosystems. |
National Objectives Framework (NOF) |
The National Objectives Framework (NOF) sets the necessary values, outcomes and specific attributes required to meet the hierarchy of obligations and local definitions of Te Mana o Te Wai, and enable long-term visions to be realised. |
National Policy Statement on Freshwater Management (NPS-FM) |
The Government’s National Policy Statement on Freshwater Management (NPS-FM) 2020 gives effect to new protection we must give to our waterways. |
Natural lake |
A lake that is not a controlled lake or an off-stream artificial lake. |
Non-consumptive take
|
A take of water from a water body where the same volume of water is returned: (a) to the same water body; and (b) at the same time or within a timeframe as near as practicable to when the take is operating. |
Off-stream artificial lake |
A lake that is located outside of the bed of a river and that is not part of a water body. |
Off-stream dam |
Any dam of which no part is located in, on, under or over the bed of a lake or river, or within a natural inland wetland. |
On-site wastewater treatment system |
A system that receives wastewater or sewage from a single landholding and treats and applies the wastewater or sewage to a land application system on the same property. |
Organic waste |
Biodegradable vegetative material which includes compost and green waste and does not include any sewage, greywater, industrial or trade waste or agricultural waste. |
Paper Allocation/Paper Water |
Paper allocation is any quantity of water that is allocated under a resource consent but that exceeds the actual (recorded) rate of take or volume of water taken by the consent. |
Pasture-based wintering |
Break feeding cattle, other than lactating dairy cows, on pasture between 1 May and 30 September inclusive where supplementary feed offered is more than 10,000 kgDM/ha (fresh weight (grams) x dry matter percentage (as a decimal) x hectares). |
Permanent forest or permanent forestry |
A forest deliberately established (including through planting or facilitated regeneration) without any intention to harvest, including for the purpose of creating a biological carbon sink, that: (a) comprises an area of at least 1 hectare of continuous forest cover, but (b) does not include: (i) plantation forestry; (ii) forest species in urban areas; or (iii) nurseries and seed orchards; or (iv) trees grown for fruit or nuts; or (v) willows and poplars space planted for soil conservation purposes. |
Pit toilet |
A hole in the ground used for the disposal of sewage, also referred to as a long drop or pit latrine. |
Plan Change 1 (PC1) |
Plan Change 1 amended the Regional Plan: Waste for Otago by:
|
Plan Change 8 (PC8) |
Plan Change 8 made a range of amendments to the current water and waste plan provisions to better manage specific urban and rural activities, known to be contributing to water quality issues in parts of Otago. The rural discharge provisions made operative are set out in the following parts of Plan Change 8:
|
Potentially contaminated |
Part of a site where an activity or industry described in the Ministry for the Environment’s Hazardous Activities and Industries List (October 2011) has been or is being undertaken on it or where it is more likely than not that such an activity or industry is being or has been undertaken on it, but excludes any site where a detailed site investigation has been completed and reported and which demonstrates that any contaminants in or on the site are at, or below, background concentrations. |
Proposed Otago Regional Policy Statement 2021 (pORPS) |
The Proposed Otago Regional Policy Statement 2021 (pORPS) sets the direction for future management of Otago's natural and physical resources. |
Rakatirataka |
Leadership, authority, and decision-making powers. |
Reasonable mixing |
The mixing that occurs in a mixing zone as defined in APP[RWS] of this Plan. |
Regionally significant infrastructure |
(1) roads classified as being of regional importance in accordance with the One Network Framework, (2) electricity sub-transmission infrastructure, (3) renewable electricity generation facilities that connect with the local distribution network but not including renewable electricity generation facilities designed and operated principally for supplying a single premise or facility, (4) telecommunication and radiocommunication facilities as respectively defined in section 5 of the Telecommunications Act 2001 and in section 2 of the Radiocommunications Act 1989, (5) facilities for public transport, including terminals and stations, (6) the following airports: Dunedin, Queenstown, Wānaka, Alexandra, Balclutha, Cromwell, Ōamaru, Taiari. (7) navigation infrastructure associated with airports and commercial ports which are nationally or regionally significant, (8) defence facilities for defence purposes in accordance with the Defence Act 1990, (9) community drinking water abstraction, supply treatment and distribution infrastructure that provides no fewer than 25 households with drinking water for not less than 90 days each calendar year, and community water supply abstraction, treatment and distribution infrastructure (excluding delivery systems or infrastructure primarily deployed for the delivery of water for irrigation of land or rural agricultural drinking-water supplies) (10) community stormwater infrastructure, (11) wastewater and sewage collection, treatment and disposal infrastructure serving no fewer than 25 households, (11A) oil terminals, bulk fuel storage and supply infrastructure, and ancillary pipelines at Port Chalmers and Dunedin, and (12) Otago Regional Council’s hazard mitigation works including flood protection infrastructure and drainage schemes.
For the avoidance of doubt, any infrastructure identified as nationally significant infrastructure is also regionally significant infrastructure. |
Regionally Significant Wetland |
A Regionally Significant Wetland is any wetland that has one or more of the following values:
|
Reticulated wastewater system |
A wastewater treatment plant and the attached network of structures including pipes and pump stations owned and operated by a group, institution, territorial authority or company that primarily treats wastewater from more than one site. |
Riparian margin |
The land within 10 metres of the bed of a lake or continually flowing river (measured horizontally). |
Sacrifice Paddock |
This as the same meaning as in the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater 2020: An area on which — (a) cattle are repeatedly, but temporarily, contained (typically during extended periods of wet weather); and (b) the resulting damage caused to the soil by pugging is so severe as to require resowing with pasture species. |
Secondary take |
The taking of water that has previously been taken from one water body and discharged to another, for the purpose of supplying the secondary take. |
Sediment trap |
An excavated or bunded area in a critical source area or the bed of river that is not continually flowing that is designed and constructed solely for the purpose of allowing sediment to drop from the water column. |
Site-specific river flow |
The flow that must be maintained below a surface water take point. |
Solid animal effluent |
Solid excreta from land-based animals that cannot be pumped and sprayed, including bedding material and manure, but does not include dead animals or animal parts. |
Stockholding area |
It has the same meaning as in the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater 2020: (a) an area for holding cattle at a density that means pasture or other vegetative ground cover cannot be maintained (for example, feed pads, winter pads, standoff pads, and loafing pads); but (b) does not include an area used for pastoral purposes that is in the nature of a stockyard, milking shed, wintering barn, or sacrifice paddock. |
Stormwater network |
An interconnected system of pipes, open channels, treatment devices and ancillary structures which are operated by a territorial authority, network utility operator, company or collective and used for collecting, conveying, diverting, storing, treating, or discharging stormwater. |
Stormwater sub-catchment |
An area of land defined for the purposes of managing the quantity and quality of stormwater. |
Taiāpure |
A coastal fishing area of special significance to iwi. |
Taoka/Wāhi taoka |
A treasured place or valued possession. |
Te Mana o te Wai |
Te Mana o te Wai - the vital importance and health of our water - is a national policy emphasising that the health of our waterways must come first, above all else. |
Vertebrate toxic agent |
A trade name product used to control, kill, or limit the viability of vertebrate pests (such as rabbits, possums, and rodents), including products that have a negative effect on reproduction but do not include attractant or repellent substances that are not toxic. |
Wāhi tūpuna |
Landscapes and places that embody the relationship of mana whenua and their culture and traditions with their ancestral lands, water, sites, wāhi tapu and other taoka. |
Waste |
Has the same meaning as in the Waste Minimisation Act 2008 as set out below: (a) means anything disposed of or discarded; and (b) includes a type of waste that is defined by its composition or source (for example, organic waste, electronic waste, or construction and demolition waste); and (c) to avoid doubt, includes any component or element of diverted material, if the component or element is disposed of or discarded |
Waste oil |
Any oil that has been refined from crude oil, or any synthetic hydrocarbon oil, that has been used, and as a result of such use, has become unsuitable for its original purpose due to the presence of impurities or contaminants or the loss of original properties. |
Weir |
An open-topped structure across the full width of any lake or river that: (a) alters the water level and the flow characteristics of the water; and (b) allows water to flow passively through or over top. |
Permitted
No consent needed if the conditions are met
A permitted activity can be carried out without the need for a resource consent so long as it complies with any requirements, conditions and permissions specified in the plan.
Controlled
Consent always granted and conditions are restricted
A controlled activity requires a resource consent before it can be carried out. The council can impose conditions on the consent, but only for those matters over which the council has reserved control.
Restricted discretionary
Consent needed and conditions are restricted
A restricted discretionary activity requires a resource consent before it can be carried out. The consent authority can exercise discretion as to whether or not to grant consent, and to impose conditions, but only in respect of those matters over which it has restricted its discretion in the plan or over which discretion is restricted in national environmental standards or other regulations.
Discretionary
Consent needed and conditions are not restricted
A discretionary activity requires a resource consent before it can be carried out. The consent authority can exercise full discretion as to whether or not to grant consent and as to what conditions to impose on the consent if granted.
Non-complying
Consent needed and conditions are not restricted
A non-complying activity requires a resource consent before it can be carried out. A resource consent can be granted for a non-complying activity, but first the applicant must establish that the adverse effects of the activity on the environment will be minor or that the activity will not be contrary to the objectives of the plan.
Prohibited
Not allowed
A prohibited activity may not be carried out. In addition, no resource consent can be sought or granted to authorise the activity.
In 2019, the Minister for the Environment told Otago Regional Council we could do better to manage Otago's lakes, rivers and streams and directed us to prepare a new regional policy statement and land and water plan by the end of 2023.
We are now developing a plan to set new rules and regulations on how we as a community do this. Mana whenua, the kaitiaki of our land, has joined us in this journey.
This new plan will align with the Government goal to improve water quality within one generation.
The new plan will become a powerful planning tool to manage land and waterways in the region. It will bring change in the status quo, and this will affect people. When the impacts of the new plan start to be felt in the years ahead, you’ll want to understand it and feel you have contributed to it.
Te Mana o te Wai - vital importance and health of our water - is part of Otago’s collective well-being and future sustainability. The health of some our waterways is excellent, but others need improving. This is important because Otago’s waterways support all life from threatened native fish, the mahika kai we collect and the swimming holes we love, to how we earn our living and enjoy clean groundwater.
Te Mana o te Wai is respecting and looking after the water, so the water can look after you. It also recognises that mana whenua, councils, water users and the wider community all have a role in managing freshwater.
The new Land and Water Plan will be based on a whole-of-catchment approach - ki uta ki tai (from the mountains to the sea) - that is consistent with Te Mana o te Wai and prioritises the health and well-being of water bodies.
ORC and rūnaka have worked in partnership on developing the Land and Water Regional Plan, at governance and working levels, so that content represents the aspirations of Māori/iwi.
To reflect Otago’s environment, we divided the region into five Freshwater Management Units (FMU). The Clutha Mata-Au FMU, being quite large, is further divided into five rohe, which means "area" in te reo.
An FMU is a water body or water bodies of a manageable size for setting freshwater objectives and limits. This can be a river, a part of, or a group of catchments. All regional councils are required to set FMU.
You can find your FMU/rohe here.
We will keep all information up to date on our website.
While the LWRP is still a draft plan, it was important that we engage with Otago communities to get their feedback before we finalised the plan. Key information contained in the plan, including proposed impacts was available on our website for this.
In November 2021 and March 2022, we wanted to find out which waterbodies (lakes, rivers, streams, wetlands) are most important to you, what you value most about them and what characteristics are key and received feedback from more than 560 people.
Of your feedback, these values were strongest:
Other values included:
Thank you to everyone who provided feedback or came along to one of the community meetings in our first two rounds of engagement to tell us what you want for land and water resources in our region.
More information on the feedback from rounds one and two can be found here.
Once the feedback has been collated, ORC will review and reflect on all materials and these will be used to inform development of the final LWRP. This draft Plan is shared with ORC councillors in December 2023.
Drop-in sessions, online discussions and an online feedback form were offered to give anyone the chance to share their feedback. This closed 6 November 2023.
The Council realises that improving freshwater outcomes will mean change, and that can have impacts for the economy. That is why it was important to do our homework ahead of time.
The Council worked together with industry groups on the economics and made sure we used real farms and growing operations from across Otago to understand the importance of fresh water.
This included giving people from across Otago a voice in how the impacts of different policy options is understood - this was done through the creation of Catchment Stories.
On 6 November 2023. Following this, ORC review all feedback and then revise the draft plan, before sharing with Councillors.
Below are answers to questions that were frequently asked at our drop-in discussions.
If the activity you are undertaking has permitted activity criteria under the notified plan and you can’t meet one or some of those criteria, you can apply for resource consent to do the activity. The timing of when you need consent depends on the rule.
When new rules are notified and are going through the submissions and hearing process, existing activities can carry on as they were. Six months after any new rules become operative (which means after any appeals are settled and could be as far away as 2026), existing activities need to:
The exception to this is activities that already have a resource consent, such as a water take – those can continue until the existing consent expires or is reviewed.
For more information, please see:
Practice Note: Consenting under Proposed and Operative Plans
If you have questions that couldn’t be answered today or you want to get in contact with Otago Regional Council, please feel free to call us on 0800 474 082 and ask for the Land and Water Policy team, or email policy@orc.govt.nz.
We are actively looking at the most efficient way to manage effects on the environment, and Freshwater Farm Plans might be one of those opportunities we can leverage. Given lots of people will need them, we are keen to hear your feedback on what we could include as part of a Farm Plan.
Freshwater Farm Plans are very useful to improve environmental performance, particularly in tailoring actions to individual farms so that ‘good management practices’ are adopted. However, the science investigations have shown that in some areas of the region, ‘good management practices’ will not address declining water quality trends or result in the more substantial water quality improvements required.
At this stage, it seems unlikely that Freshwater Farm Plans can achieve that on their own.
In those situations, resource consents will likely be needed, alongside Freshwater Farm Plans, to push for more significant reduction in contaminant losses. However, it is still important that we get feedback on the types of activities you think could be managed through Freshwater Farm Plans, noting this may not be able to apply everywhere and for everything.
If you have questions that couldn’t be answered today or you want to get in contact with Otago Regional Council, please feel free to call us on 0800 474 082 and ask for the Land and Water Policy team, or email policy@orc.govt.nz.
There are a wide range of setback requirements in the draft plan. The setbacks vary, depending on the kind of activity, the level of risk, and the level of environmental improvement required. In general, they ensure that activities or structures that pose a risk to water quality (such as discharges of effluent to land, cultivation, or wastewater treatment plants) do not take place or are not established in a location that is too close to waterbodies.
For farming activities, one of the biggest sources of contaminants is overland flow of water into waterbodies, when that water contains, or has the opportunity to pick up sediment, dung and other contaminants. A setback (preferably vegetated), usually varying in width depending on the slope, is one way to filter out these contaminants. Some higher-risk activities, such as intensive winter grazing and sacrifice paddocks, have large areas of exposed soil in winter, and are a high risk of sediment and dung getting into waterbodies, unless there is some separation.
Typical setbacks for farming activities are:
For forestry planting, the setbacks are intended to provide for some protection of water quality at all stages of the forestry process, acknowledging that if trees are setback from waterbodies, related activities, such as harvesting are less likely to occur close to waterbodies. The setbacks will also protect waterbodies from some of the effects of standing trees, such as shading. Within the setback, riparian planting will be able to occur. At this stage the setbacks are 20m for forestry on slopes less than 10 degrees and 50m for above 10 degrees.
We are looking at ways that the setbacks can be refined, while still providing the environmental improvements required and are keen for your feedback on this. For example, this may come with greater emphasis on critical source areas for farming activities, or slash and sediment management for forestry.
The way the rules have been designed mean that if you can't or don't want to meet the setbacks, you can apply for consent to undertake your activity closer than the setbacks state. The consent would put mitigations in place to ensure the risk was adequately managed. We are also looking into whether a Freshwater Farm Plan can be used as an alternative to some of these setback requirements – your feedback on the ways this could work is sought.
If you have questions that couldn’t be answered today or you want to get in contact with Otago Regional Council, please feel free to call us on 0800 474 082 and ask for the Land and Water Policy team, or email policy@orc.govt.nz.
Leachate from silage storage is full of nutrients, especially nitrogen. It is highly concentrated and extremely damaging to waterways and can contaminate groundwater. To manage this risk, two options for a volume threshold are included, which will require larger storage facilities to obtain resource consent.
The initial figure corresponded with the volume for storing other organic waste. Feedback (from Council) indicated that this was too small, and we have offered two options: 250m³ and 500m³. The intention is that smaller to medium pits/stacks would be permitted while larger pits/stacks (which generally indicate a larger operation or more intense land use) would require consent.
We are actively considering both whether there should be a threshold, and if so, what it should be, so welcome feedback on this.
A third option may be permitting any size silage storage where there is an impervious base and the leachate is captured and goes into a farm effluent system or is captured and spread via effluent spreaders or slurry tanker. This could better manage low-risk silage storage.
If you have questions that couldn’t be answered today or you want to get in contact with Otago Regional Council, please feel free to call us on 0800 474 082 and ask for the Land and Water Policy team, or email policy@orc.govt.nz.
Sacrifice paddock is defined in the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater (NES): as an area on which —
(a) cattle are repeatedly, but temporarily, contained (typically during extended periods of wet weather); and
(b) the resulting damage caused to the soil by pugging is so severe as to require resowing with pasture species
The rule has been included because it is an activity that is highlighted in the NES, and in the Environment Court considering Southland’s plan.
Sacrifice paddocks are used to reduce soil damage on large areas of the farm and minimise other risks to the environment and animal welfare. The use of sacrifice paddocks is infrequent and for short periods of time (i.e. as a planned back-up option for bad weather or other circumstances).
Risks associated with sacrifice paddocks are similar to those of intensive winter grazing and pasture-based wintering – pugging, run-off into waterways, devegetation, loss of soil armouring and delays to pasture regrowth.
The time limit (the use of a sacrifice paddock should not exceed a total of more than 60 days in any 12month period) is based on the fifth interim decision of the Environment Court (23 December 2022) on the proposed Southland Water and Land Plan. It is understood that sacrifice paddocks are not used consistently over long periods of time (then it would become pasture-based wintering). Similarly, the size limit (5 ha for landholdings less than 500ha, or 1% or up to 30ha for landholdings greater than 500ha, whichever is lesser) is based on the Southland Environment Court Decision.
We are keen to understand if sacrifice paddocks are always part of an intensive winter grazing operation and can be managed as part of that existing consenting process, or if there is a better way of managing the activity.
We are also keen to hear if the time limits and/or size restrictions are workable for Otago.
If you have questions that couldn’t be answered today or you want to get in contact with Otago Regional Council, please feel free to call us on 0800 474 082 and ask for the Land and Water Policy team, or email policy@orc.govt.nz.
The definition of pasture-based wintering means break feeding cattle, other than lactating dairy cows, on pasture between 1 May and 30 September inclusive where supplementary feed offered is more than 10,000 kgDM/ha.
This is based on the fifth interim decision of the Environment Court (23 December 2022) from the proposed Southland Water and Land Plan.
Pasture-based wintering is the supplementary feeding of cattle that are grazing on pasture over winter. It is distinguished from intensive winter grazing where stock graze on fodder crops as well as supplementary feed. Sheep are excluded from this definition – we are interested in your views on that.
Grazing cattle on pasture over winter has the potential to generate adverse environmental effects, including sediment run-off into waterways, devegetation, loss of soil armouring and delays to pasture regrowth. The risk arising from such grazing on pasture is generally related to how intensively the pasture is grazed, hence the threshold on how much introduced feed there is. At high levels of introduced feed, the risk can become similar to the risks from intensive winter grazing on forage crops (where grazing leaves little or no residual cover).
Based on the Environment Court’s direction for Southland, we think we should be managing this activity and are keen to understand the implications of the rule for Otago.
If you have questions that couldn’t be answered today or you want to get in contact with Otago Regional Council, please feel free to call us on 0800 474 082 and ask for the Land and Water Policy team, or email policy@orc.govt.nz.
The current permitted volume (20 m³/month, 240 m³/year) results in large quantities of gravel extraction, with no oversight by council because consent is not required. While gravel extraction can be useful in managing a river’s flood carrying capacity, it can negatively impact the river’s health when not managed well. We think the current volume is too high to be sure it’s not impacting the health of the river.
The smaller volume (5 m³ in any 12 consecutive months) will retain some ability to extract gravel at a level that should not impact river health. A consent will be required for larger extractions, to enable the inclusion of site-specific good practice type conditions and ensure that the health of the river can be maintained.
This conservative approach is an interim step, while additional work is undertaken to improve our knowledge of gravel across Otago. In the longer term, it is intended that there will be greater guidance for gravel extractions, which may support larger permitted volumes in some waterbodies.
If you have questions that couldn’t be answered today or you want to get in contact with Otago Regional Council, please feel free to call us on 0800 474 082 and ask for the Land and Water Policy team, or email policy@orc.govt.nz.
Dairy support is one of the more intense activities that can occur on a farm and often has a higher risk of contaminant losses to the environment. If water quality is to be maintained where it is good, and improved where it is poor, a first step needs to be keeping a close watch on activities that might result in an increase of losses – hence the need for a resource consent for any new or increased area of dairy support.
There is a region-wide rule that requires resource consent for new or increased areas of dairy support. The application would need to show how losses of contaminants from the farming operation will be reduced.
Existing dairy support can continue under a Freshwater Farm Plan, unless it is in an area that requires consent for dairy or dairy support (currently proposed to be Taiari/Taieri, North Otago, Dunedin and Coast FMUs, and Manuherekia and Lower Clutha rohe). These areas have been identified because they have more water quality challenges that need to be addressed.
In general, if both activities were occurring on the same property, that could be covered by a single consent, along with any other activity that required consent. In fact, it would be ORC’s preference to bundle all your activities together and get one application that covered everything.
For dairy farming and dairy support, there are region-wide rules that require resource consent for any new or increased area, much like the current National Environmental Standard for Freshwater.
In some areas, where water quality pressures are lower, existing dairy farming and dairy support can continue under a Freshwater Farm Plan. In other areas, where more significant water quality improvements are required, or there are declining trends in water quality, existing dairy farming and dairy support will require a resource consent, and more focussed reduction of losses is likely to be required.
If you have questions that couldn’t be answered today or you want to get in contact with Otago Regional Council, please feel free to call us on 0800 474 082 and ask for the Land and Water Policy team, or email policy@orc.govt.nz.
ORC seeks to improve the accuracy of future technical work that informs the development of regulatory and non-regulatory approaches for managing nutrients and other contaminants in the region. The information provided in Freshwater Farm Plans can help ORC developing a better understanding of how farming contributes to overall loadings and make sure that these management approaches are effective.
ORC will make sure that any such information provided through the Freshwater Farm Plans will be treated confidentially and will not be made available to the public (unless it is aggregated and or shared in a manner that does not allow for the source of this information (i.e. the individual farm) to be identified.
Typically, reductions in water allocation to ensure that the total consented allocation in a catchment is, overtime, brought in line with the relevant take limits in the LWRP will be done through the consent replacement process. (The RMA specifies that a consent authority may review the conditions of consent to align the levels, flows, rates or standards set by a regional rule with consent conditions. However, the RMA does not give the Council the power to cancel a consent upon review, and only allows Council to reduce the amount taken by a certain extent.)
The first step in reducing water allocation to ensure that the consented allocation in a catchment is brought in line with the relevant take limit is by removing “paper” allocation. This means that when a consent holder applies for a new resource consent to replace an existing one, ORC will only allocate a quantity of water that does not exceed the historic actual use of water under the previous consent and that reflects reasonable and efficient use of that water.
Where removing “paper” allocation will not be sufficient to achieve the take limit, reductions in water allocation will need to occur in stages. During the first stage (i.e. first consent replacement process) “paper” allocation will be removed. During the second stage further reductions will need to be achieved through either the implementation of a community-led proposal for achieving the take limit (for example through water sharing) or, alternatively, through pro rata claw backs across the different users.
The intention of this threshold was to be able to look more closely at those farms that were applying comparatively high levels of synthetic nitrogen fertiliser. We understand that very few Otago farms breach the 190kg/ha/yr NES cap of synthetic nitrogen fertiliser. In some areas of Otago (some specific FMUs or parts of FMUs), there is a need to reduce the amount of nitrogen entering waterbodies, and in some other areas the trend for nitrogen in waterbodies is getting worse. A 190kg/ha/yr threshold for synthetic nitrogen fertiliser is unlikely to help address this problem, as it doesn’t affect many farms.
The 190kg/ha/yr cap in the NES is a firm ‘cap’. In the draft Plan, a lower threshold is suggested, but it is not a ‘cap’: it will trigger a resource consent, which will allow a more focussed look at how contaminant losses can be reduced. This will likely require implementation through specific provisions in a Freshwater Farm Plan.
We are still looking at whether 100kg/ha/yr N is the right threshold, and we welcome your feedback. By way of context, for the case study dairy farms in the economic profile work, the average nitrogen fertiliser use was 142kg/ha/yr and the median was of 124kg/ha/yr. For sheep and beef farms, most used less than 30kg/ha/yr of nitrogen fertiliser on pastures.
The stocking rate was included as a proxy for intensity. The stocking rate of 2.5 cows per hectare is based on what the maximum stocking rate might be for a farm to be self-sufficient in terms of feed (e.g. if it was a finishing sheep and beef farm). It is intended to be a generous interpretation of the basic level needed for efficient pasture management (2.5 cows is roughly equal to 20+ livestock units – a ewe with a lamb at foot). It is not intended to be representative of current stocking rates, which vary across the region. At or below this level, a controlled activity resource consent will be required (likely to be those farms where less than 20% of feed is imported i.e. system 1 to system 3 dairy farms). A controlled activity means consent must be granted, and we can impose conditions on the matters identified as being controlled.
It is worth keeping in mind that this stocking rate is for a farm’s total area, not effective area. We agree that it may not be best to use a single threshold across all areas of Otago, and welcome suggestions of alternatives.
More stringent requirements are needed for more intense land uses (likely to be those where 20% or more of feed is imported i.e. some system 3, system 4 and system 5 dairy farms). More focussed reduction of losses is likely to be required from farming that has higher risk or losses.
If you have questions that couldn’t be answered today or you want to get in contact with Otago Regional Council, please feel free to call us on 0800 474 082 and ask for the Land and Water Policy team, or email policy@orc.govt.nz.