Give us your feedback on the Draft Natural Hazards Adaptation Strategy. Feedback closes 23 February.
Learn moreGive us your feedback on the Draft Natural Hazards Adaptation Strategy. Feedback closes 23 February.
Having completed investigations to understand the natural hazards in more detail, the next step is to understand and assess different types of adaptation or hazard management interventions.
The programme focus is now on this next step: “What can we do about it?”
Developing an adaptation approach in this complex setting will be challenging, . The most suitable adaptation approaches will need to be technically viable, affordable, and endorsed by the community and other programme partners.
We say “approaches” because it’s more likely to be combinations or sequences of hazards interventions to manage or adapt to the natural hazard impacts. These will probably include both shorter- and longer-term responses.
We will consider all types of response – engineering, land-use planning and civil defence. As an example, you can view one of our recent mitigation assessment reports here:
We want to be clear that no decisions have been made, and we continue to fully involve the community in our work.
In coming months, we will set out a decision-making process for input from the community, the regional and district councils, and other project partners such as Iwi and DOC. This process will likely need to be presented to Council for endorsement.
Below is a proposed high-level schedule for the key community engagement milestones throughout the programme.
We are aiming to have a final agreed adaptation by the end of June 2024 (this a specified deliverable in the ORC Long-term Plan). The strategy is intended to be a living document, which will evolve in response to new information on hazard and risk, the needs of the community, and the work of the respective councils.
This strategy may include:
Once the strategy document is complete, we will move into implementing the work programme.
Implementing some larger-scale adaptation or hazard management actions may be a long or costly process – we may need to integrate these actions with Council LTP processes, assess funding availability, develop business cases, and carry out further feasibility studies or cost-benefit analysis.
However, not all approaches will necessarily be costly or take a long time to implement. We may be able to implement some actions in the shorter term – these may include continuing to improve environmental monitoring and flood warning networks, Civil Defence planning, and continuing our river management approaches.
In 2022, ORC completed projects to assess flooding and liquefaction hazards in the head of Lake Wakatipu. You can read these reports here:
Land River Sea Consulting Ltd (LRS) assessed the flood hazard to the Dart-Rees floodplain and Glenorchy from the Dart and Rees Rivers, and high levels in Lake Wakatipu. Read the findings now.
If an earthquake hit the Glenorchy area what would happen? An engineering report from Tonkin + Taylor Ltd looks at the risk Glenorchy township has to liquefaction and the possible impacts natural hazards could have on the area.
Read the short summary of both report findings, explaining the key points with images to illustrate lateral spreading, the floodplain and what might happen in an earthquake or flood.
Following these technical assessments, ORC has received requests from community members to help better understand the risk levels of these natural hazard events, and how these risks compare with other locations around New Zealand.
Compared to previous hazards studies which have provided information of the characteristics of the natural hazard events, a risk assessment will consider in more detail the potential impacts and vulnerability to those events.
ORC will engage consultant experts to carry out this work, aiming to have it completed by mid-2023. Alongside a technical report, the consultant will also provide a plain-language summary of all findings, and will include comparisons of the natural hazard risks with other locations around New Zealand. For example, this might include comparison of the liquefaction risk at Glenorchy to that in Christchurch.